• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign Up

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • COVID-19 and Medicare
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Ossen Medicare Outreach, Education and Advocacy Project
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign Up

What’s New in Infection Control Surveys for Nursing Facilities?

September 3, 2020

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has revised the focused infection control survey protocol.[1] Now, for the first time, CMS requires surveyors to review the care actually provided to a sample of residents (and among a sample of staff).  This important change, supported by the Center for Medicare Advocacy (Center), may result in the citation of more infection control deficiencies than prior focused infection control surveys, which appeared to be limited in scope, short in duration (one surveyor conducted several surveys in one day), and more focused on paperwork compliance than on observing whether staff providing care to residents correctly and consistently followed longstanding infection control practices.

Accurate citing of deficiencies is a key component of the oversight system for nursing facilities.  If deficiencies are not cited, facilities will operate under the assumption they have no problems in their infection control practices and they will not make any changes or corrections. 

The Center for Medicare Advocacy has contended that the limited number of deficiencies that have been cited during the COVID-19 pandemic is not plausible when so many residents and staff are dying from the coronavirus. This is further unlikely when, as reported by the Government Accountability Office in May 2020, infection control deficiencies before the pandemic were “widespread” and “persistent.”[2]

On August 14, 2020, CMS reported that it had cited more than 180 facilities with immediate jeopardy infection control deficiencies (triple the rate in 2019) and imposed civil money penalties of nearly $10 million, averaging $55,000 for each facility.[3]  As we have reported,[4] CMS told residents’ advocates in an August 19, 2020 call that information about these surveys, to date, was reported only on an internal CMS database; these surveys had not been publicly reported.  As described below, publicly reported infection control data, released by CMS on August 26, continue to show many fewer immediate jeopardy infection control deficiencies than CMS reports having cited – 48, compared to nearly 180.

However, news reports indicate more deficiencies and penalties than CMS publicly reports.  For example, on September 2, 2020, the Baltimore Sun reported that state inspection reports show infection control deficiencies were cited at 64 Maryland nursing facilities, with ten facilities facing fines ranging from $70,000 to $380,000.[5]  The Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center was fined $275,000 in June.  CMS’s cumulative data release of August 26 reports only a March 4 survey at Collingswood that did not cite an infection control deficiency; the release does not show any survey at Collingswood citing an infection control deficiency.

CMS’s August 26 Cumulative Data Release

On August 26, 2020, CMS made public the fourth cumulative release of 25,593 targeted infection control surveys, covering the period March 4 through July 31.  The surveys cited 556 infection prevention and control deficiencies in 539 facilities (524 facilities were cited with one deficiency, 13 facilities were cited with two deficiencies, two facilities were cited with three deficiencies). 

Of the 556 infection control deficiencies, 48 deficiencies (8.6%) were cited at the immediate jeopardy level. 

Although all four releases of infection control surveys and deficiencies show that less than 3% of focused infection control surveys cited deficiencies, an increasing percentage of these deficiencies has been classified as immediate jeopardy.

Date of CMS ReleaseNumber of SurveysNumber (%) of infection control deficiencies citedNumber (%) of infection control deficiencies classified as immediate jeopardy
June 4   5,724    163 (2.8%)    1 (1.0%)
June 24   9,899    262 (2.6%)    4 (1.5%)
July 29 16,987    347 (2.0%)  22 (6.6%)
August 26 25,593    556 (2.2%)  48 (8.6%)

The surveys released in August also show that:

  • The scope of deficiencies has shifted.  While the first three cumulative releases showed that the largest category of deficiencies was cited as “few,” the fourth cumulative release shows that “some” is now the largest category with respect to scope of deficiencies.
  • Most deficiencies (503 of 556 deficiencies, 90.5%) are cited as minimal harm or potential for actual harm (levels D, E, and F), also known as “no harm” deficiencies. 
  • “No harm” deficiencies (levels D, E, and F) were predominant in all four cumulative releases of infection control surveys.
  • As in previous releases, Texas cited more infection control deficiencies than any other state – 120 of 556 deficiencies (21.6% of the infection control deficiencies cited nationwide).

Conclusion

The revised survey protocol may lead to a more accurate evaluation of facilities’ failures to comply with infection control requirements.

Although an increasing proportion of the deficiencies is classified as immediate jeopardy, the 48 immediate jeopardy infection control deficiencies publicly reported in August are still far fewer than the nearly 180 number claimed by CMS. 

  • To read the full report, please go to: https://medicareadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Special-Report-Whats-New-In-Infection-Control.pdf

September 3, 2020 – T. Edelman; M. Edelman


[1] CMS, “Interim Final Rule (IFC), CMS-3401-IFC, Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency related to Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Testing Requirements and Revised COVID-19 Focused Survey Tool,” QSO-20-38-NH (Aug. 26, 2020), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-20-38-nh.pdf.

[2] GAO, “Infection Control Deficiencies Were Widespread and Persistent in Nursing Homes Prior to COVID-19 Pandemic,” GAO-20-576R (May 20, 2020), https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/707069.pdf.  The report is discussed in CMA, “GAO on Infection Control Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities Before Covid-19 Pandemic: ‘Widespread,’ ‘Persistent,’ ‘Ignored’” (CMA Alert, May 21, 2020), https://medicareadvocacy.org/gao-widespread-snf-deficiencies/.

[3] CMS, “Trump Administration Has Issued More Than $15 Million in Fines to Nursing Homes During COVID-19 Pandemic” (Press Release, Aug. 14, 2020), https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-administration-has-issued-more-15-million-fines-nursing-homes-during-covid-19-pandemic.

[4] CMA, “Responding to CMS Announcement on Nursing Home Enforcement – Infection Control Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities: QCOR Data” (CMA Alert, Aug. 20, 2020), https://medicareadvocacy.org/responding-to-cms-announcement-on-nursing-home-enforcement-infection-control-deficiencies-in-nursing-facilities-qcor-data/.

[5] Meredith Cohn, “Dozens of Maryland nursing homes found with deficient infection control during coronavirus pandemic,” Baltimore Sun (Sep. 2, 2020), https://www.baltimoresun.com/coronavirus/bs-hs-nursing-home-covid-inspections-20200902-ajvxfl76lba6xn6u7bitx7crpm-story.html.

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: alert, Skilled Nursing Facility, snf, Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics. Check them out:

  • Medicare Basics
  • CMA Alerts
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Sign Up for CMA Alerts

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

Latest Tweets

  • RT @medicarerights: A new issue brief from @RRFAging focuses on #economicsecurity in later life—the challenges & the solutions. Access… https://t.co/S9B27WnJP3, Jan 25
@CMAorg

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2021 · Center for Medicare Advocacy