• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • Medicare Costs
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • CMA Annual Impact Report
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Community Outreach and Education Project (COEP)
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Build a Legacy with CMA
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Senator Collins Is Right to Oppose the Senate’s Version of Trumpcare

June 29, 2017

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Senator Collins Is Right to Oppose the Senate’s Version of Trumpcare

By Judith Stein

The Senate has released the previously secret details of its healthcare legislation – and they are not good. The Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA) of 2017 hurts our nation’s healthcare system as a whole and our most vulnerable citizens in particular.

Sen. Susan Collins said on Monday night that she will not support the BCRA, which could ultimately decide the bill’s fate. Here are five reasons why her Senate Republican colleagues should also oppose Trumpcare:

1. The House version was “mean,” and the Senate version is still mean.

In May, the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act. It was so severe that President Trump called it “mean” and said the Senate should make it more “generous” and “kind.”

The Senate bill certainly cannot be called “kind.” Like the House bill, it guts Medicaid, which will devastate tens of millions of families, and in particular, older Americans aged 50 – 64, disabled people, and children. The bill also ends the Affordable Care Act’s guarantees of maternity and mental health care. And it will leave millions uninsured.

2. Millions of Americans rely on Medicaid.

The Senate legislation doesn’t just repeal the Affordable Care Act; it completely redesigns and ruins Medicaid. And Medicaid isn't just for low income Americans. Nearly two-thirds of the program’s spending supports older and disabled adults.

Imagine that you or one of your family members has Alzheimer’s Disease or suffers from a sudden stroke. Nursing home costs could quickly exhaust your savings. In that scenario, Medicaid would be there to cover the rest of your costs. Currently, the program pays for nearly half of Americans’ nursing home costs. This crucial piece of our country’s healthcare safety net would be in jeopardy under Trumpcare.

Children are at risk too. In Maine, more than 250,000 people, including 100,000 children, rely on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) program. These kids have no other source of health care coverage.

3. Trumpcare is a job killer.

The health care industry constitutes roughly one-sixth of the American economy. A new report from the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University and the Commonwealth Fund estimate that repealing Obamacare could cost almost three million jobs by 2021. This is because a lack of federal funding would cut gross state product by $1.5 trillion between 2019 and 2023, meaning less money to spend on hiring. In addition, consumers will be forced to spend more on their healthcare and have less disposable income to spend, which will cause losses in a multitude of industries.

Furthermore, a recent report by LeadingAge and the Center for Consumer Engagement in Health Innovation showed that 700,000 home health aides could lose their jobs under Trumpcare. This comes at a time when millions more home care workers are estimated to be needed in the coming decade to support our growing population of aging loved ones.

4. Trumpcare hurts Medicare recipients too.

Nearly 20 percent of Medicare recipients also rely on Medicaid. In Maine, that number is even higher: around 28 percent. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, more than 60 percent of the 10 million Medicare beneficiaries who receive Medicaid need help with daily self-care activities, such as eating, bathing, or dressing, which are important for independent living. Most Medicare beneficiaries who receive Medicaid have a cognitive or mental impairment, such as dementia, which can create the need for support to live safely at home.

The BCRA legislation would wreak havoc for American families when they are most in need. It would also hurt the next generation of Medicare beneficiaries. It repeals a slight payroll tax increase for high-wage earners that will reduce the long-term solvency of Medicare by 2 – 4 years. 

5. The bill hasn’t received anything resembling adequate vetting.

The bill was developed by 13 white, wealthy men in secret with no text, no hearings, and no public debate. Public opinion polls show dismal support for the bill, with approval ratings between 17 and 21 percent. And yet, Speaker McConnell is rushing a floor vote before the July 4 recess. This leave precious little time for amendments and review.

Simply put, this is not a health care bill. There are real issues in today’s healthcare landscape. We don’t need to add major new problems for families and the economy. The BCRA benefits the few, wealthiest Americans at the expense of most Americans.

The Center for Medicare Advocacy is ready to partner with everyone who will work to make America healthier and protect our care. We look forward to working with Senator Collins and other lawmakers to develop real healthcare legislation that will accomplish just that.


Judith Stein

Judith Stein founded the Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. in 1986, where she is the Executive Director. From 1977 until 1986, Ms. Stein was the Co-Director of Legal Assistance to Medicare Patients (LAMP), where she managed the first Medicare advocacy program in the country. She has extensive experience in developing and administering Medicare advocacy projects and representing Medicare beneficiaries. In 2013 Ms. Stein was appointed to the National Commission on Long-Term Care by House of Representatives Leader Nancy Pelosi. She has been published and quoted about Medicare and its relation to the Affordable Care Act in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, and Politico.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: LTE

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics.
Sign Up for CMA's Free Newsletter
Register for CMA's Free Webinars

  • Medicare Basics
  • Medicare Reform
  • CMA Alerts
  • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

National Voices of Medicare Summit

With the many threats currently facing the Medicare program, now is the time to come together as allies and explore ways to advocate for comprehensive Medicare coverage, health equity, and quality health care. Drawing inspiration from real-life experiences and stories of beneficiaries and caregivers, we hope to share impactful discussions with you.

Learn more.

Center for Medicare Advocacy Follow 10,543 5,330

A national nonpartisan, nonprofit law organization working to advance access to comprehensive #Medicare coverage and quality #healthcare.

CMAorg
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
13 Feb 2022350854955864486

Medicare’s 3-day hospital rule is supposed to control costs. It actually increases them.

Longer hospital stays. Higher spending. More risk for patients.

Why are we still doing this?

To read more & sign-up for our free, weekly newsletter:⬇️

Image for twitter card

3-Day Inpatient Hospital Requirement Increases Total Medicare Costs - Center for Medicare Advocacy

Study finds that the 3-day inpatient requirement increases Medicare costs and does not improve patients’ health outcomes.

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2022350854955864486 Retweet on Twitter 2022350854955864486 0 Like on Twitter 2022350854955864486 1 X 2022350854955864486
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
12 Feb 2021999425598763065

AI in Medicare: Innovation — or a new barrier?

Medicare’s pilot uses AI to review claims in traditional Medicare to reduce wasteful spending. But could it also delay or deny care? What do you think?👇

For our free newsletter:

https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/medicare-is-experimenting-with-having-ai-review-21333053.php

Image for twitter card

Medicare is experimenting with having AI review claims – a cost-saving measure that could risk...

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2021999425598763065 Retweet on Twitter 2021999425598763065 0 Like on Twitter 2021999425598763065 0 X 2021999425598763065
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
10 Feb 2021236007962603840

Home health care doesn’t end just because a condition is chronic or stable.

In 2013, CMA won Jimmo v. Sebelius, making it clear:
Coverage depends on the need for skilled care — not on improvement.

Know Jimmo. Know your rights 👇
🔗

Image for twitter card

Know Jimmo | Home Health Care is Available for Medicare Beneficiaries with Long Term, Chronic, and...

The key to coverage is whether the individual requires skilled nursing or therapy and whether care would be safe ...

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2021236007962603840 Retweet on Twitter 2021236007962603840 2 Like on Twitter 2021236007962603840 1 X 2021236007962603840
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
9 Feb 2020978920435151256

Short staffing. Burnout. Residents left waiting.

What caregivers describe in Connecticut is a microcosm of a national nursing home crisis — and the human cost is real. Full story 👇

Our weekly alert:

https://www.newstimes.com/connecticut/article/trump-repeal-nursing-home-staffing-ct-21337753.php

Image for twitter card

Connecticut lawmakers, caregivers decry Trump-era repeal of nursing home staffing rules

Around 90% of nursing home beds are currently occupied in Connecticut. Advocates say by 2035 there could be a 3,000-bed shortage. 

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2020978920435151256 Retweet on Twitter 2020978920435151256 1 Like on Twitter 2020978920435151256 0 X 2020978920435151256
Load More

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2026 · Center for Medicare Advocacy