• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign Up

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • COVID-19 and Medicare
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Ossen Medicare Outreach, Education and Advocacy Project
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign Up

Revisions to “Two-Midnight Rule” Do Not Help Hospitalized Medicare Patients in Observation Status

December 2, 2015

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) promulgated the Two-Midnight Rule, which, for the first time in the Medicare program’s 50-year history, determined patient status in a hospital by reference to time.[1]  Specifically, CMS’s new rule provided that a patient would be considered an inpatient, and the hospital stay would be covered by Part A, only if the patient was formally admitted as an inpatient by a physician, with the expectation that the hospital stay would cross at least two midnights.  The controversial rule has not been implemented.

In July 2015, CMS proposed a minor revision to the Two-Midnight Rule.  CMS proposed to allow a physician to order inpatient status for a patient for whom the expectation was a hospital stay of less than two midnights.[2]  Short in-patient stays would be allowed, but only on a case-by-case basis.  Short in-patient stays would also be prioritized for medical review, which would consider all treatment during the course of a patient’s hospitalization, not the patient’s presentation at the beginning of the hospital stay.

The Center for Medicare Advocacy (Center) saw little relief for Medicare patients in the proposed rule and anticipated continued problems for Medicare beneficiaries who remain in an acute care hospital for multiple days, all called outpatient.[3]  The key problem for patients is financial.  Outpatients, including observation status patients, are denied Part A coverage for their subsequent stay in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and must pay the SNF out-of-pocket.  Outpatient status for hospitalized patients, including observation status, is an issue that the Center has frequently addressed in weekly Alerts.[4]

CMS has now published, without modification, final rules that incorporate the minor revision proposed in July.[5]  42 C.F.R. §412.3(d).  Effective January 1, 2016, CMS will allow for Medicare Part A payment on a case-by-case basis for inpatient admissions that do not satisfy the 2-midnight benchmark, if the documentation in the medical record supports the admitting physician’s determination that the patient requires inpatient hospital care despite an expected length of stay that is less than 2 midnights.[6]

CMS insists that the two-midnight rule and its revision do not interfere with the practice of medicine or the clinical judgment of physicians, confirming that physicians continue to determine “the need to keep the beneficiary at the hospital, to order specific services, or to determine appropriate levels of nursing care or physical locations within the hospital.”[7]  The rule addresses solely “Medicare payment,” specifically, whether Medicare Part A will pay for the hospital stay.[8]

CMS rejected all public comments that opposed its approach and recommended alternatives.  It reports that its solicitation of comments on short-stay payment policies “has not produced any consensus on a recommended payment policy.”[9]

An ad hoc coalition of national organizations (including health care professionals, health care providers, and beneficiary advocates) has reached consensus.  For several years, the coalition has supported federal legislation to count all time spent by a patient in the hospital, for purposes of satisfying the “three-midnight” requirement for Part A coverage of post-hospital care in a SNF.[10]  This legislation does not address whether observation status or long outpatient stays are appropriate; it simply calls for all time spent in the hospital to be counted.  The identical bipartisan bills are H.R. 1571 and S. 843, the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act of 2015.[11]

Observation status and outpatient status remain significant problems for hospitalized patients.  The Center continues to hear from the families of patients who are hospitalized for many nights, are called outpatients, and are then required to pay for their SNF stay out-of-pocket.  On November 20, the daughter of a patient who had been hospitalized for six midnights called the Center.  On the seventh day of hospitalization, November 20, her mother was being discharged to the SNF, which required her to pay $10,600 on admission.  Paying out-of-pocket, the daughter wrote a personal check for $10,600.

CMS needs to fix the problem of observation status and long outpatient stays for Medicare patients. 

December 3, 2015 – T. Edelman


[1] 78 Fed. Reg. 50495, 50906-50954 (Aug. 19, 2013).  The regulations are discussed in the Center for Medicare Advocacy, “Observation Status: New Final Rules from CMS Do Not Help Medicare Beneficiaries” (Alert, Aug. 29, 2013), https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/observation-status-new-final-rules-from-cms-do-not-help-medicare-beneficiaries/.
[2] 80 Fed. Reg. 39199 (July 8, 2015). 
[3] Center for Medicare Advocacy, “Proposed Revisions to ‘Two-Midnight’ Rule Provide Little, If Any, Relief for Medicare Beneficiaries Stuck in the Hospital in Observation Status” (Alert, July 9, 2015), https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/proposed-revisions-to-two-midnight-rule-provide-little-if-any-relief-for-medicare-beneficiaries-stuck-in-the-hospital-in-observation-status/.
[4] See Center for Medicare Advocacy, Observation Status, https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/?s=observation&op.x=0&op.y=0.
[5] 80 Fed. Reg. 70297, 70538-70549 (Nov. 13, 2015). 
[6] 80 Fed. Reg. 70297, 70545.
[7] 80 Fed. Reg. 70297, 70543.
[8] 80 Fed. Reg. 70297, 70543.
[9] 80 Fed. Reg. 70297, 70549.
[10] 42 C.F.R. §1395x(i).
[11] The coalition’s Fact Sheet is available at https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/6.30.15.Observation-Stays-Coalition-One-Pager.pdf.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: Acute Hospital Care, Observation Status, Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics. Check them out:

  • Medicare Basics
  • CMA Alerts
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Sign Up for CMA Alerts

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

Latest Tweets

  • RT @medicarerights: A new issue brief from @RRFAging focuses on #economicsecurity in later life—the challenges & the solutions. Access… https://t.co/S9B27WnJP3, 5 hours ago
@CMAorg

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2021 · Center for Medicare Advocacy