• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign Up

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • COVID-19 and Medicare
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Ossen Medicare Outreach, Education and Advocacy Project
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign Up

Resident Councils of Washington v. Leavitt

July 30, 2004

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

No. CV04-1691 (W.D. Wash.), filed July 30, 2004

Updated: January 3, 2008

Issue: Whether regulations that authorize states to allow Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing facilities to hire feeding assistants with eight hours of training violate the Nursing Home Reform Law or the Administrative Procedure Act.

Relief sought: A declaratory judgment that the regulations are invalid and a permanent injunction prohibiting their enforcement.

Status: The complaint was filed July 30, 2004, and an amended complaint naming individual and organizational plaintiffs from Michigan was filed on October 28, 2004.  Shortly after the Secretary filed an answer and a document purporting to be the Administrative Record, the American Health Care Association (AHCA) moved to intervene as a defendant as of right, or, alternatively, by permission of the court. On January 25, 2005, the Court denied the motion to intervene.

The Secretary's motion to dismiss on standing grounds was granted in part and denied in part, with the court concluding that the two Washington organizations had standing to pursue the claims.  2005 WL 1027123 (W.D. Wash 2005)  On September 8, 2005, however, the court ruled in the government's favor on the merits.  It held that the key statutory term — "nursing or nursing-related services" — was sufficiently ambiguous that the court should defer to the Secretary's interpretation, and that the Secretary's regulation was not arbitrary and capricious and therefore did not violate the APA.

On August 31, 2007, after oral argument, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court, holding that the language of the statute was sufficiently ambiguous that the Court should defer to the Secretary's interpretation as set out in the new feeding assistant regulation. 500 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2007).  The plaintiffs did not seek review of the Court of Appeals' decision.

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: Archived Cases, Litigation

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics. Check them out:

  • Medicare Basics
  • CMA Alerts
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Sign Up for CMA Alerts

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

Latest Tweets

  • Our statement with @CANHR_CA and the Michigan Elder Justice Initiative recommends key issues of the Nursing Home Re… https://t.co/9nSwt3tAwT, Jan 15
@CMAorg

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2021 · Center for Medicare Advocacy