• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • Medicare Costs
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • CMA Annual Impact Report
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Community Outreach and Education Project (COEP)
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Build a Legacy with CMA
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

More Infection Control Deficiencies Cited in Nursing Homes – Most Considered “No Harm”

December 23, 2020

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

During the health care pandemic and beginning in March 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) suspended the regular survey process and announced its plan to conduct limited surveys that focused on infection prevention and control issues.[i]  CMS has publicly reported the results of these limited services each month through a link on its website Nursing Home Compare (now Care Compare[ii]).  The Center for Medicare Advocacy has analyzed these survey reports monthly and reported our findings in a series of CMA Alerts and Reports. 

In August, CMS encouraged states to resume conducting standard (annual) and complaint surveys, to the extent possible,[iii] and is now reporting these survey findings through the same link on its public website.  The CMS report describes the cumulative infection control deficiencies (F-880) that have been cited following infection control surveys, annual surveys, and complaint surveys since March.  While an increasing number of infection control deficiencies are cited, most deficiencies continue to be classified as not causing residents any harm.

November 2020 Data

Although CMS has generally posted data on the last Wednesday of each month, it posted its seventh cumulative data release on November 18, reflecting deficiencies cited from March through October, as reported by state survey agencies to CMS.  The cumulative data release for November includes, for the first time, deficiencies that were cited in much earlier months.  For example, the July data release (covering deficiencies reported through June) indicated that 347 infection control deficiencies had been cited; the November data release (as reported below and covering deficiencies reported through October) indicates that 972 infection deficiencies were cited, as of June.

According to the November release, 4052 facilities have been cited with at least one infection control deficiency since March.  A considerably higher percentage of surveys (nearly 10 percent) cited infection control deficiencies, but a lower percentage (6.38 percent) of the deficiencies were cited as immediate jeopardy, compared to the October cumulative release.

Date of CMS releaseTotal number of surveys reportedTotal number (percent) of infection control deficiencies citedTotal number (percent) of immediate jeopardy deficiencies cited
June 4   5,724   163 (2.8%)    1 (1.0%)
June 24   9,899   262 (2.6%)    4 (1.5%)
July 29 16,987   347 (2.0%)  22 (6.6%)
August 26 25,593   556 (2.2%)  48 (8.6%)
September 30 32,681   777 (2.4%)  75 (9.7%)
October 28 40,1441,104 (2.8%)112 (10.1%)
November 18 52,680*4,918 (9.34%)314 (6.38%)

*A total of 61,820 surveys were conducted but more than 9,000 were duplicates (for example, some surveys were coded as both complaint and infection control) so that only 52,680 distinct surveys were actually conducted.  The 61,820 duplicated surveys included 37,772 focused infection control surveys, 873 standard surveys, and 23,175 complaint surveys. 

Infection Control Deficiencies, National Data

These 52,680 unduplicated surveys cited a total of 4918 infection control deficiencies at 4052 nursing facilities. 

Focused infection control surveys cited the largest number of infection control deficiencies.

As shown below, most infection control deficiencies (4580, 93 percent) were classified as “no actual harm, with the potential for minimal harm” (“no harm”) – categories D, E, and F.

Scope and Severity of Deficiencies Cited, Cumulative

The seventh cumulative report documents a large increase in infection control deficiencies.  However, most of them (4580, 93 percent) were classified as no harm; only 314 of these deficiencies (6.38 percent) were classified as immediate jeopardy. 

Deficiencies Cited, by Monthly Cumulative Report

Scope and Severity, Cumulatively, by Release Number

The largest number of infection control deficiencies was cited in June, 972 deficiencies; the smallest number, in March, 322 deficiencies. 

Infection Control Deficiencies, by Month

However, the largest number of immediate jeopardy deficiencies was cited in May, 64; the smallest number, in March, seven.

Immediate Jeopardy Infection Control Deficiencies, by Month

The largest percentage of deficiencies classified as immediate jeopardy was cited in May, 9.77 percent; the smallest percentage, in March, 2.17 percent.

Infection Control Deficiencies, State Data

The November data release, for the first time, reports that every state cited at least one infection control deficiency since March.

The seventh cumulative data release indicates that California has cited the largest number of infection control deficiencies – 502.  Until this data release, Texas had been reported to have cited the largest number of infection control deficiencies.

Cumulative Infection Control Deficiencies by State

However, the percentage of infection control deficiencies cited as immediate jeopardy by each state ranged from zero percent in 11 states (Alaska, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming), Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia to 20.53 percent (Michigan).

Percent of Infection Control Cited as Immediate Jeopardy, by State

States cited various numbers of facilities with infection control deficiencies.  California cited the largest number of facilities (395), while Vermont cited one.  (California has more than 1200 nursing facilities; Vermont, 38 nursing facilities.)

Four thousand fifty-two (4052) facilities were cited with an infection control deficiency.  Most facilities (3334 facilities) were cited with a single infection control deficiency; 596 facilities were cited with two infection control deficiencies; 103 facilities were cited with three infection control deficiencies; 14 facilities were cited with four infection control deficiencies; four facilities were cited with five infection control deficiencies; and one facility was cited with seven infection control deficiencies.

Conclusion

For the first time, all states cited at least one infection control deficiency.  Eleven states have not cited any immediate jeopardy deficiencies in infection control.  Nonetheless, as throughout the pandemic, most deficiencies have been classified as “no harm.”

Dec. 17, 2020 – M. Edelman, T. Edelman


[i] CMS, “Suspension of Survey Activities,” QSO-20-12-All (Mar. 4, 2020), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-20-12-all.pdf; CMS, ‘Prioritization of Survey Activities,” QSO-20-20-All (Mar. 23, 2020), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-20-20-all.pdf

[ii] Center for Medicare Advocacy, “CMS Replaces all Eight Care-Specific Websites with Single Website: Care Compare” (CMA Alert, Dec. 10, 2020), https://medicareadvocacy.org/cms-replaces-all-eight-care-specific-websites-with-single-website-care-compare/

[iii] CMS, “Enforcement Cases Held during the Prioritization Period and Revised Survey Prioritization,” QSO-20-35-ALL (Aug. 17, 2020), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-20-35-all.pdf

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics.
Sign Up for CMA's Free Newsletter
Register for CMA's Free Webinars

  • Medicare Basics
  • Medicare Reform
  • CMA Alerts
  • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

National Voices of Medicare Summit

With the many threats currently facing the Medicare program, now is the time to come together as allies and explore ways to advocate for comprehensive Medicare coverage, health equity, and quality health care. Drawing inspiration from real-life experiences and stories of beneficiaries and caregivers, we hope to share impactful discussions with you.

Learn more.

Center for Medicare Advocacy Follow 10,601 5,346

A national nonpartisan, nonprofit law organization working to advance access to comprehensive #Medicare coverage and quality #healthcare.

CMAorg
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
15 Jul 2077388746765262880

Government programs like Medicare can be the difference between life & death - especially denials vs approvals. A denial is rarely the final answer. You have the right to appeal, and we're here to help you with that - from education to advocacy to litigation💙

Our free📬:

Reply on Twitter 2077388746765262880 Retweet on Twitter 2077388746765262880 1 Like on Twitter 2077388746765262880 0 X 2077388746765262880
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
10 Jul 2075662102665064836

💙 It's Feel Good Friday! Today's feel good news: Medicare’s new GLP-1 Bridge could make treatment more affordable for millions.

Beginning July 1, some eligible people with Part D coverage can access certain weight-management medications for a $50 monthly copay.

GLP-1s may

Reply on Twitter 2075662102665064836 Retweet on Twitter 2075662102665064836 0 Like on Twitter 2075662102665064836 0 X 2075662102665064836
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
7 Jul 2074602071580446810

🤖 Should Medicare pay for AI diagnostic software?

CMS is proposing a new payment pathway for algorithm-driven tools that can produce diagnoses, risk scores, or treatment recommendations.

Promise, red flag, or both?

Article:

📩More Medicare updates:

Image for twitter card

CMS floats new Medicare payment category for AI diagnostic software: 6 notes 

CMS floats Medicare payment for AI diagnostic software, proposing a new category to standardize reimbursement for algorithm-driven clinical tools.

www.beckerspayer.com

Reply on Twitter 2074602071580446810 Retweet on Twitter 2074602071580446810 0 Like on Twitter 2074602071580446810 0 X 2074602071580446810
Retweet on Twitter Center for Medicare Advocacy Retweeted
ClevelandClinic avatar Cleveland Clinic @ClevelandClinic ·
6 Jul 2074195930111480230

Our cardiovascular researcher shares why AFibs happen when you sleep and what can you do about it:

Image for twitter card

I’m Having AFib at Night: Should I Be Worried?

There are many reasons why you might go into AFib overnight — from sleep apnea to sleeping on your left side. A cardiovascular researcher explains.

cle.clinic

Reply on Twitter 2074195930111480230 Retweet on Twitter 2074195930111480230 2 Like on Twitter 2074195930111480230 17 X 2074195930111480230
Load More

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2026 · Center for Medicare Advocacy