• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • Medicare Costs
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • CMA Annual Impact Report
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Community Outreach and Education Project (COEP)
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Build a Legacy with CMA
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Medigap News: Disparities in Enrollment Rights; Bill Introduced to Strengthen Medigap Access and Protections

July 19, 2018

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Kaiser Family Foundation Report

A report recently issued by the Kaiser Family Foundation, “Medigap Enrollment and Consumer Protections Vary Across States” (July 2018), “provides an overview of Medigap enrollment and analyzes consumer protections under federal law and state regulations that can affect beneficiaries’ access to Medigap. In particular, [the] brief examines implications for older adults with pre-existing medical conditions who may be unable to purchase a Medigap policy or change their supplemental coverage after their initial open enrollment period.”

After describing Medigap enrollment rights available under federal law (in other words, rules governing when issuers of such policies must sell them to individuals), the Report highlights the variance in state laws, which can go further than the minimum federal enrollment standards to provide additional enrollment rights.  Among other findings, the Report notes that “[o]nly four states (CT, MA, ME, NY) require either continuous or annual guaranteed issue protections for Medigap for all beneficiaries in traditional Medicare ages 65 and older, regardless of medical history.” The Report goes on to note that “[i]n all other states and D.C., people who switch from a Medicare Advantage plan to traditional Medicare may be denied a Medigap policy due to a pre-existing condition, with few exceptions, such as if they move to a new area or are in a Medicare Advantage trial period.” 

In addition, “[o]nly 5 percent of traditional Medicare beneficiaries under age 65 had Medigap in 2015—considerably lower than the shares in older age brackets [citation omitted]. The low enrollment in Medigap by beneficiaries under age 65 is likely due to the lack of federal guarantee issue requirements for younger Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities […] and higher rates of Medicaid coverage for people on Medicare with disabilities who tend to have relatively low incomes.”  As discussed in a CMA  Alert from October 2016, state law varies considerably with respect to extending Medigap rights to individuals under 65.

The Report also highlights that Medigap enrollment rights are considerably more limited than the annual opportunities Medicare beneficiaries have to get in and out of private Medicare Advantage and Part D plans, and that those who wish to change from a Medicare Advantage plan to Medigap coverage may be disadvantaged:

Medigap is not subject to the same federal guaranteed issue protections that apply to Medicare Advantage and Part D plans, with an annual open enrollment period. As a result, in most states, medical underwriting is permitted which means that beneficiaries with pre-existing conditions may be denied a Medigap policy due to their health status, except under limited circumstances.

Federal law requires Medigap guaranteed issue protections for people age 65 and older during the first six months of their Medicare Part B enrollment and during a “trial” Medicare Advantage enrollment period. Medicare beneficiaries who miss these windows of opportunity may unwittingly forgo the chance to purchase a Medigap policy later in life if their needs or priorities change [citation omitted]. This constraint potentially affects the nearly 9 million beneficiaries in traditional Medicare with no supplemental coverage; it may also affect millions of Medicare Advantage plan enrollees who may incorrectly assume they will be able to purchase supplemental coverage if they choose to switch to traditional Medicare at some point during their many years on Medicare.

As the Center has noted elsewhere, recent statutory and regulatory changes have served to both favor Medicare Advantage enrollment and undermine Medigaps as an option for Medicare beneficiaries. Rights to purchase Medigap supplemental insurance policies should be expanded to people under 65 and to include ongoing access for all in order to provide real,  meaningful choices for all Medicare beneficiaries.  As discussed below, a Congressional bill has recently been introduced that would vastly improve this situation.

Bill Introduced to Strengthen Medigap Access and Protections

Today, July 18, 2018, , Representative Sandy Levin (D-MI), the Ranking Member of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, introduced the “Medigap Consumer Protection Act of 2018” (see press release, bill text, and summary).

As noted in the press release issued by Congressman Levin’s office, among other things, this Bill would:

  • “Strengthen federal consumer protections to ensure that beneficiaries with disabilities and end-stage renal disease can purchase a Medigap policy without being denied coverage or subjected to higher premiums based on their health status or pre-existing conditions.
  • Extend access protections to other beneficiaries, including individuals in Medicare Advantage who wish to switch back to traditional Medicare.
  • Require the Secretary of HHS to conduct a comprehensive overhaul of the Plan Finder website to ensure that beneficiaries have access to complete and understandable information when comparing enrollment options.
  • Restore access to the two most popular Medigap policies (Plans C and F), which are set to be eliminated for beneficiaries who enroll in Medicare after January 1, 2020.”

If enacted, this Bill would be an important step toward improving beneficiary choice regarding how they wish to access their Medicare coverage, and leveling the playing field between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. 

July 19, 2018 – D. Lipschutz

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: Medigap, Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics.
Sign Up for CMA's Free Newsletter
Register for CMA's Free Webinars

  • Medicare Basics
  • Medicare Reform
  • CMA Alerts
  • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

National Voices of Medicare Summit

With the many threats currently facing the Medicare program, now is the time to come together as allies and explore ways to advocate for comprehensive Medicare coverage, health equity, and quality health care. Drawing inspiration from real-life experiences and stories of beneficiaries and caregivers, we hope to share impactful discussions with you.

Learn more.

Center for Medicare Advocacy Follow 10,543 5,330

A national nonpartisan, nonprofit law organization working to advance access to comprehensive #Medicare coverage and quality #healthcare.

CMAorg
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
13 Feb 2022350854955864486

Medicare’s 3-day hospital rule is supposed to control costs. It actually increases them.

Longer hospital stays. Higher spending. More risk for patients.

Why are we still doing this?

To read more & sign-up for our free, weekly newsletter:⬇️

Image for twitter card

3-Day Inpatient Hospital Requirement Increases Total Medicare Costs - Center for Medicare Advocacy

Study finds that the 3-day inpatient requirement increases Medicare costs and does not improve patients’ health outcomes.

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2022350854955864486 Retweet on Twitter 2022350854955864486 0 Like on Twitter 2022350854955864486 1 X 2022350854955864486
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
12 Feb 2021999425598763065

AI in Medicare: Innovation — or a new barrier?

Medicare’s pilot uses AI to review claims in traditional Medicare to reduce wasteful spending. But could it also delay or deny care? What do you think?👇

For our free newsletter:

https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/medicare-is-experimenting-with-having-ai-review-21333053.php

Image for twitter card

Medicare is experimenting with having AI review claims – a cost-saving measure that could risk...

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2021999425598763065 Retweet on Twitter 2021999425598763065 0 Like on Twitter 2021999425598763065 0 X 2021999425598763065
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
10 Feb 2021236007962603840

Home health care doesn’t end just because a condition is chronic or stable.

In 2013, CMA won Jimmo v. Sebelius, making it clear:
Coverage depends on the need for skilled care — not on improvement.

Know Jimmo. Know your rights 👇
🔗

Image for twitter card

Know Jimmo | Home Health Care is Available for Medicare Beneficiaries with Long Term, Chronic, and...

The key to coverage is whether the individual requires skilled nursing or therapy and whether care would be safe ...

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2021236007962603840 Retweet on Twitter 2021236007962603840 2 Like on Twitter 2021236007962603840 1 X 2021236007962603840
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
9 Feb 2020978920435151256

Short staffing. Burnout. Residents left waiting.

What caregivers describe in Connecticut is a microcosm of a national nursing home crisis — and the human cost is real. Full story 👇

Our weekly alert:

https://www.newstimes.com/connecticut/article/trump-repeal-nursing-home-staffing-ct-21337753.php

Image for twitter card

Connecticut lawmakers, caregivers decry Trump-era repeal of nursing home staffing rules

Around 90% of nursing home beds are currently occupied in Connecticut. Advocates say by 2035 there could be a 3,000-bed shortage. 

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2020978920435151256 Retweet on Twitter 2020978920435151256 1 Like on Twitter 2020978920435151256 0 X 2020978920435151256
Load More

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2026 · Center for Medicare Advocacy