• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign Up

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs (2021)
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • COVID-19 and Medicare
    • Medicare Costs (2021)
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • Annual Report
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Ossen Medicare Outreach, Education and Advocacy Project
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign Up

Medicare and the Dilemma of “Choice”

March 11, 2021

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On March 1, 2021, the New York Times published a column by Paul Krugman titled “Too Much Choice is Hurting America”.  Mr. Krugman discusses how “Economics 101 and conservative ideology say that more choice is always a good thing.”   He concludes, though, that the “spread of this ideology” means we live in “a country in which many of us are actually offered too many choices, in ways that can do a lot of harm.”  With respect to health coverage, he notes that “many people end up with heavy financial burdens because they chose the wrong health insurance plan — yet even experts have a very hard time figuring out which plan is best.” He states that “many aspects of life that used to be just part of the background now require potentially fateful decisions [… for example]  When you turn 65, you don’t just get put on Medicare, you also decide which of many Medicare Advantage plans to sign up for.”  

In 2021 Medicare beneficiaries have an average of 33 private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and 30 Part D stand-alone drug plans from which to choose.  As discussed in a previous Center for Medicare Advocacy CMA Alert (November 2020), most people actually won’t choose a plan in a given year.

Mr. Krugman doesn’t even capture the full extent of choices most people with Medicare must make.  Among other things, people must decide whether to remain in traditional Medicare (and, if so, can or should they purchase a Medigap plan) or enroll in an MA plan, should they choose a stand-alone Part D coverage or an MA plan with Part D coverage, and do they have some other coverage and if so, how will it coordinate with Medicare?  As we discuss in another CMA Alert (March 2020), even the choices of coverage options in Medicare are unequal; for example, while people can get in and out of a Medicare Advantage plan on an annual basis, most people have limited opportunities to purchase a Medigap plan – a fact many people discover too late.

Once an individual with Medicare has made their original enrollment decision, even if the choice they originally made no longer meets their needs, the majority never change. It’s often too complicated, and many Medicare beneficiaries can’t make a choice. Their prior employer may have put them in a Medicare Advantage plan; they may not be able to return to traditional Medicare because they cannot purchase a Medigap policy to cover traditional Medicare’s high cost-sharing; they may not have the ability or connectivity to use the sophisticated tools needed to review and make choices.

Further, the information on which people rely to make decisions can be inaccurate, or worse, misleading.  For example, there have been recent problems with the Medicare Plan Finder, the primary tool that people use to compare plan options, and in the last several years the Medicare program has departed from an objective approach towards coverage options – including in the Medicare & You Handbook – and has instead steered people towards enrollment in MA plans.  Meanwhile, private Medicare Advantage costs the Medicare program more per enrollee than the traditional program, while usually offering its members fewer choices of health care providers. All this highly-touted choice is both harmful and elusive.   Krugman ends his column with a warning: “So the next time some politician tries to sell a new policy — typically deregulation — by claiming that it will increase choice, be skeptical. Having more options isn’t automatically good, and in America we probably have more choices than we should.”   We agree.  Choice in Medicare can be both burdensome and unequal.  One way to address this is to rebalance some of these inequities by leveling the playing field between Medicare Advantage and the traditional Medicare program in the interest of all beneficiaries.

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: alert, Medicare Advantage, Medicare Reform, Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics. Check them out:

  • Medicare Basics
  • CMA Alerts
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Sign Up for CMA Alerts

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

Medicare: Build Back Better

By prioritizing Medicare beneficiaries and the health systems that serve them, we can avoid drastic national consequences. The Center for Medicare Advocacy proposes a five-part plan that will make Medicare a bulwark against the worsening health and economic challenges facing the American people.

Learn more.

Latest Tweets

  • Special thanks from @CMAorg to @PowersLawFirm for the many years of ongoing support and for sponsoring our recent N… https://t.co/8z36yJHyQd, 13 hours ago
@CMAorg

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2021 · Center for Medicare Advocacy