• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign Up

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • COVID-19 and Medicare
    • Medicare Costs (2020 & 2021)
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Ossen Medicare Outreach, Education and Advocacy Project
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign Up

CMS Revises Its Medicare Secondary Payer Collection Letters Following Haro v. Sebelius Decision

July 28, 2011

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) program authorizes the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to recover compensation payments from beneficiaries who have private insurance that should be primarily responsible for their medical expenses.[1]

In a class action lawsuit brought by Medicare beneficiaries and their attorney to challenge certain harsh MSP collection practices, a federal district court in Tucson, Arizona, recently held that these collection practices exceed the agency's statutory authority.[2]  Although CMS filed a notice of appeal on June 30, 2011, it has also revised two of its MSP collection letters to comply with the district court's orders.[3]

In the first part of its decision, the court held that CMS cannot insist that it be paid within 60 days of demand if the beneficiary has exercised his or her right to either appeal the amount claimed as reimbursement by Medicare, or to request a waiver of recovery.  In the second part of its decision, the court focused on the demands made on the beneficiary's attorney, holding that CMS cannot hold the attorney financially responsible if the attorney does not withhold funds from his or her client until the MSP claim has been paid.

The "Rights & Recovery" Letter

When the MSP recovery contractor first learns that an insurance liability claim is being made by a beneficiary, it sends the beneficiary and/or the beneficiary's attorney a "rights and responsibilities" letter.  The newly revised form for this letter can be found on the contractor's website, www.msprc.info/.  The revised letter omits the statement made in earlier letters that Medicare should be repaid before funds are disbursed for other purposes.  It adds a statement that Medicare will not take any collection action if an appeal or waiver request is pending.  This change is significant because the demand for immediate repayment has had a chilling effect on beneficiaries' right to contest the MSP claim.

The Payment "Demand" Letter

A second letter is sent by the MSP contractor to the beneficiary and/or the beneficiary's attorney after the insurance claim has been resolved by settlement or judgment.  The revised form for this "demand" letter states that repayment of the MSP claim within 60 days is "requested,"  replacing language from the earlier MSPRC letters that stated "you must repay Medicare within 60 days."   It also clarifies that Medicare will not initiate any recovery action while an appeal or waiver request is pending.  Although it states that collection of unpaid Medicare debts may include Treasury offsets against monies payable by federal agencies, it no longer mentions termination of Social Security, Railroad Retirement, or future Medicare payments, and states that notice of any intended collection action will be provided. 

The MSP Manual

In addition to the revisions of the MSP form letters, CMS has also undertaken a review of Chapter 7 of the Medicare Secondary Payer Manual since the Haro decision.  See CMS Pub 100-05, at www.cms.gov/Manuals/IOM/list.asp .   It is likely that CMS revisions to this chapter of the manual, which specified contractor recovery procedures for liability insurance, will reflect changes in MSP collection practices ordered by the court.

 


[1] Additional information about the Medicare Secondary Payer program can be found in earlier Alerts at  https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/medicare-info/medicare-secondary-payer-program/
[2] Haro, et al. v. Sebelius, 2011 WL 2040219 (D.Ariz. May 9, 2011).
[3] CMS had already revised these notices once, after the Haro lawsuit was filed, but the district court held that those initial changes were not adequate to cure the deficiencies identified by the plaintiffs.

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: litigation update, Medicare Secondary Payer Program, Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics. Check them out:

  • Medicare Basics
  • CMA Alerts
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Sign Up for CMA Alerts

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

Latest Tweets

  • RT @medicarerights: A new issue brief from @RRFAging focuses on #economicsecurity in later life—the challenges & the solutions. Access… https://t.co/S9B27WnJP3, Jan 25
@CMAorg

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2021 · Center for Medicare Advocacy