• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate Now
  • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

Center for Medicare Advocacy

Advancing Access to Medicare and Healthcare

  • Eligibility/Enrollment
  • Coverage/Appeals
    • Medicare Costs
    • Self Help Materials – Toolkits & More
  • Topics
    • Basic Introduction to Medicare
    • Medicare Costs
    • Home Health Care
    • Improvement Standard and Jimmo News
    • Nursing Home / Skilled Nursing Facility Care
    • Outpatient Observation Status
    • Part B
    • Part D / Prescription Drug Benefits
    • Medicare for People Under 65
    • Medicare “Reform”
    • All Other Topics
    • Resources
      • Infographics
  • Publications
    • CMA Alerts
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
    • Infographics
    • The Medicare Handbook
    • SNF Enforcement Newsletter
    • Elder Justice Newsletter
    • Medicare Facts & Fiction
    • Articles by Topic
  • Litigation
    • Litigation News
    • Cases
    • Litigation Archive
    • Amicus Curiae Activities
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Editorials & Letters to the Editor
    • CMA Comments, Responses, and Letters
    • CMA in the News
  • About Us
    • National Voices of Medicare Summit
    • Mission Statement
    • CMA FAQs
    • CMA Annual Impact Report
    • Personnel & Boards
    • The Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Connecticut Dually Eligible Appeals Project
    • Community Outreach and Education Project (COEP)
    • National Medicare Advocates Alliance
    • CMA Webinars
    • Products & Services
    • Testimonials
    • Career, Fellowship & Internship Opportunities
    • Contact Us
  • Support Our Work
    • Donate Now
    • Build a Legacy with CMA
    • Join the Center for Medicare Advocacy Founder’s Circle
    • Take Action
    • Share Your Health Care Story
    • Tell Congress to Protect Our Care
    • Listen to Medicare & Health Care Stories
    • Sign up for CMA’s weekly newsletter!

CMA Report: Nurse Staffing Deficiencies In Nursing Facilities

January 10, 2019

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Nursing Home Reform Law (1987) established the federal standards for nurse staffing in nursing facilities: registered nurses eight consecutive hours per day; licensed nurses 24 hours per day; and “sufficient” nursing staff to meet residents’ needs.[1]

Most nursing facilities do not have sufficient numbers of nurses to provide the care that residents need.  The result is poor care outcomes for residents – avoidable pressure ulcers, medication errors, inappropriate use of psychotropic medications, failure to assist residents with activities of daily living, avoidable weight loss, falls, and more.  

In 2014, the Center for Medicare Advocacy looked at nurse staffing deficiencies that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) cited in the four-year period 2010-2013.  In an Alert entitled “Staffing Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities: Rarely Cited, Seldom Sanctioned,” the Center reported that CMS cited few staffing deficiencies and that financial penalties for even the most serious deficiencies – those labeled “immediate jeopardy” – were infrequent.[2]

In December 2018, the Center again reviewed deficiencies cited by CMS for insufficient nurse staffing, this time, between November 28, 2017 (the effective date of the new, uniform federal survey process) and December 18, 2018.[3]  While CMS cited more staffing deficiencies than it did in the Center’s earlier review, it continued to classify most of them as “no-harm” and to impose few enforcement actions for those it labeled “actual harm” or “immediate jeopardy.”

The overwhelming majority of the 781 deficiencies (96.8%) were cited as “no harm,” a level of noncompliance that CMS generally does not sanction with financial penalties.

Staffing Deficiencies, Nov. 28, 2017-Dec. 18, 2018
Total: 781 Deficiencies

Level of staffing deficiency

Number of facilities cited with deficiency at this level

Percentage of total staffing deficiencies cited at this level

Immediate jeopardy

  17

    2.2%

Actual harm

    6

      .7%

No harm

756

  96.8%

Substantial compliance

    2

      .2%

CMS imposed few remedies on the 23 facilities whose staffing deficiencies it called jeopardy or actual harm.

  • CMS did not impose a civil money penalty (CMP) or denial of payment for new admissions (DPNA) on 10 of the 17 facilities that it cited with immediate jeopardy deficiencies.  CMS imposed DPNA only on one facility and CMPs on six facilities.  Only two facilities with an immediate jeopardy staffing deficiency had a CMP of more than $100,000.  (It is possible that CMS imposed CMPs against additional facilities.  However, if a facility appeals the CMP, CMS does not publicly post the CMP while the appeal is pending.)
  • CMS did not impose a CMP or DNPA on two of the six facilities that it cited with actual harm deficiencies.  It imposed DPNA-only on two facilities and CMPs-only on two other facilities.  The CMPs for the two facilities averaged $28,586.

The federal survey reports were similar to each other, whether the staffing deficiency was cited as immediate jeopardy or no-harm. Surveyors follow the federal survey protocol that directs them in how to identify and cite deficiencies. Nevertheless, and even though the Center reviewed only a small number of survey reports, what is most striking is how similar the evidence appears in the survey reports, regardless of the level of noncompliance identified.Surveyors describe the failures of care through multiple examples of: poor resident outcomes, resident complaints about insufficient staffing, staff admissions that the facility is not adequately staffed to meet residents’ needs, and documentation from facility records that the facility does not have enough staff (according to its own staffing standards). Surveyors appeared more likely to cite immediate jeopardy in staffing when they cited additional jeopardy-level deficiencies. In these cases, they included additional details and examples about the staffing deficiency. However, as a general matter, the evidence that surveyors cite appears to be the same, whether the deficiency is called jeopardy or no-harm.

For the Center’s full report, including descriptions of nurse staffing deficiencies at eight nursing facilities, and recommendations to strengthen the federal oversight system to protect residents, see: https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/report-nurse-staffing-deficiencies/.

January 10, 2019 – T. Edelman


[1] 42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3(b)(4)(C)(i), 1396r(b)(4)(C)(i)), Medicare and Medicaid, respectively.
[2] “Staffing Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities: Rarely Cited, Seldom Sanctioned,” (CMA Alert, Mar. 7, 2014), https://www.medicareadvocacy.org/staffing-deficiencies-in-nursing-facilities-rarely-cited-seldom-sanctioned/. 
[3] For information on deficiencies between 2013 and 2017, see the Long Term Care Community Coalition’s reports of deficiencies cited between 2014 and 2017, by state, at https://nursinghome411.org/us-nursing-home-citations-2014-2017-november-2017/. Note: The Coalition’s state deficiency reports include all health deficiency citations. Insufficient staffing deficiencies are identified as F-353.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Article Tagged With: Weekly Alert

Primary Sidebar

Easy Access to Understanding Medicare

The Center for Medicare Advocacy produces a range of informative materials on Medicare-related topics.
Sign Up for CMA's Free Newsletter
Register for CMA's Free Webinars

  • Medicare Basics
  • Medicare Reform
  • CMA Alerts
  • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
  • CMA Webinars
  • Connecticut Info & Projects
  • Health Care Stories
  • Se habla Español

Jimmo v. Sebelius

Medicare covers skilled care to maintain or slow decline as well as to improve.

Improvement Isn’t Required. It’s the law!

Read more.

National Voices of Medicare Summit

With the many threats currently facing the Medicare program, now is the time to come together as allies and explore ways to advocate for comprehensive Medicare coverage, health equity, and quality health care. Drawing inspiration from real-life experiences and stories of beneficiaries and caregivers, we hope to share impactful discussions with you.

Learn more.

Center for Medicare Advocacy Follow 10,513 5,325

A national nonpartisan, nonprofit law organization working to advance access to comprehensive #Medicare coverage and quality #healthcare.

CMAorg
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
21h 2011552543432978851

What did we learn from the 2025–2026 Medicare Annual Enrollment Period?

Join our free webinar as experts from CMA and SHIP review the challenges, lessons learned, and what beneficiaries and advocates should know heading into 2026.

Reserve your spot👇

Image for twitter card

Free Webinar | 2025 Medicare Open Enrollment Deep Dive - Center for Medicare Advocacy

We Welcome You to Join Us! Description This webinar will look back at the 2025-2026 Medicare Annual Enrollment Per...

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2011552543432978851 Retweet on Twitter 2011552543432978851 1 Like on Twitter 2011552543432978851 0 X 2011552543432978851
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
23h 2011533228717588926

Think appealing Medicare denials is pointless? The data says otherwise.

This article highlights successful, game-changing Medicare appeals, and includes insight from our team.

Full story below👇

For Medicare updates weekly:
👉

https://www.savingadvice.com/articles/2026/01/13/10714249_7-medicare-appeals-that-succeed-more-often-than-expected.html

Image for twitter card

7 Medicare Appeals That Succeed More Often Than Expected

Don't take "no" for an answer from Medicare. Discover 7 types of appeals that lead to reversals and learn the secrets to winning your case.

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2011533228717588926 Retweet on Twitter 2011533228717588926 2 Like on Twitter 2011533228717588926 1 X 2011533228717588926
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
13 Jan 2011162388423442794

What’s really behind the care gap in Medicare Advantage — and why is it getting attention now?

Find out in the @InsNewsNet article by @sischarlene, with input from our own Christine Huberty👇

For our free weekly newsletter:
👉

https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/whats-behind-the-medicare-advantage-care-gap-for-californias-black-seniors

What's Behind the Medicare Advantage Care Gap for California's Black Seniors

Medicare 1 s a federal health insurance program for people 65 or older, and some people under 65 with certain ...

medicareadvocacy.org

Reply on Twitter 2011162388423442794 Retweet on Twitter 2011162388423442794 0 Like on Twitter 2011162388423442794 1 X 2011162388423442794
CMAorg avatar Center for Medicare Advocacy @CMAorg ·
12 Jan 2010795446927835304

🏛️Big win for Medicare! Last week, The House passed a 3-year extension of health care tax credits that help keep premiums down and coverage stable.

@TheWellNews and our co-director David Lipschutz explain why this moment matters👇

Image for twitter card

House Approves Health Subsidy Bill Expected to Help Medicare Recipients

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House on Thursday approved a three-year extension of health care tax credits that expired ...

www.thewellnews.com

Reply on Twitter 2010795446927835304 Retweet on Twitter 2010795446927835304 0 Like on Twitter 2010795446927835304 0 X 2010795446927835304
Load More

Footer

Stay Connected:

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Products & Services
  • Copyright/Privacy

© 2026 · Center for Medicare Advocacy