Special Report | Who Provides Care for Nursing Home Residents? An Update on Temporary Nurse Aides
On March 20, 2020, at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic and as part of a long list of blanket waivers and flexibilities granted to nursing facilities,[1] the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) waived the requirement that facilities not use individuals as nurse aides for more than four months unless they were trained in a state-approved nurse aide training program of at least 75 hours.[2] CMS did not waive the requirement for competency testing.[3] As the Center for Medicare Advocacy (Center) reported in July 2020, the American Health Care Association (AHCA), a major nursing home trade association, immediately announced its development of a free eight-hour on-line training course for a “temporary position intended to address the current state of emergency”[4] and many states explicitly adopted AHCA’s training program or other lesser training requirements.[5]
In a Report released today,[6] the Center finds that many states, following CMS’s April 2021 guidance discussed below, are moving, in a variety of ways, to convert these temporary workers into permanent aides, without the training that they would ordinarily have required before the pandemic. States are most commonly counting time worked as temporary nurse aides (TNAs) as if it were actual training and many are requiring few, if any, hours of additional training beyond the eight hours received on-line. In essence, many temporary aides are currently being grandfathered into permanent status as certified nurse aides. The Center considers CMS’s guidance, and states’ actions, both illegal and poor public policy. Without public debate, the permanent downgrading of the nursing home workforce is underway.
CMS Guidance on April 8, 2021
On April 8, 2021, CMS updated its guidance on several blanket waivers issued in 2020.[7] CMS did not end the waiver of nurse aide training requirements and stated that “the four-month regulatory timeframe will be reinstated when the blanket waiver ends.” Despite its recognition that lifting of the waiver would restore existing aide training regulations, CMS suggested “that states evaluate their NATCEP [Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program] and consider allowing some of the time worked by the nurse aides during the PHE [public health emergency] to count toward the 75-hour training requirement.” Many states accepted CMS’s explicit invitation to create new options for TNAs to become fully certified nurse aides (CNAs), without satisfying the states’ normal training requirements.
In the Center’s view, through this suggestion, which allows states to treat time worked as if it were time in training, CMS signaled that states are free to undermine longstanding nurse aide training requirements now, in anticipation of the end of the public health emergency. As described in the Center’s Report, CMS’s guidance has in fact encouraged states to allow workers to continue providing care to residents now and after the pandemic, even when they have less training than the state required of all aides before the pandemic and less training than the 75 hours that the federal government has required for decades as the minimum.
CMS’s gratuitous offer to states and the nursing home industry is especially troubling when CMS does not know how many people are working as TNAs and what proportion of the aide workforce they actually represent, what kind of training and how much training they received, who provided the training, where they work, which specific tasks they perform, and how well (or inadequately) they perform aide assignments. CMS has no plans to find out any of this information.
How many temporary nurse aides are there? The American Health Care Association’s Provider Magazine reported in February 2021 that 182,890 people had registered for the program and “more than 136,300 have completed and passed these courses since their launch in April, numbers that continue to rise every day.” [8] An article in the trade press Skilled Nursing News in April 2021 reported that Genesis had hired more than 600 TNAs and still employed 319 of them.[9] Estimates of TNAs working in Pennsylvania facilities range from 1,000 TNAs[10] to 4,000.[11] Iowa nursing facilities have employed 2,100 TNAs.[12] Michigan has more than 2,000 TNAs.[13] There could literally be tens of thousands of individuals with limited training providing care to residents as TNAs, now and into the indefinite future.
The Center believes that CMS’s April 2021 guidance violates federal law and is poor public policy.
Violation of Federal Law
Once the waiver of training requirements is lifted, the prior rules go into effect, in their entirety. Without engaging in formal notice and comment rulemaking, CMS does not have authority to rewrite the regulations. Federal law is specific and detailed about federal requirements for state approval of nurse aide training programs[14] and about which facilities are ineligible to conduct nurse aide training.[15] Federal law also confirms that states’ review and approval of nurse aide training and competency evaluation programs (NATCEPs) must comply with the federal standards.[16]
Poor Public Policy
Working as an aide in a nursing home is dangerous.[17] Analyzing data from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, PHI reports that “nursing assistants are injured more than three times more frequently than the typical American worker.”[18] Untrained or minimally trained workers are more likely to be injured than workers who have been more comprehensively trained.[19]
How States are Treating “Temporary Nurse Aides”
The nine-page Report describes state policies that allow TNAs to take their state’s examination without any additional training or with abbreviated training as well as states’ explicitly authorizing the grandfathering in of TNAs with no additional training or testing.
___________________
[1] CMS, COVID-19 Emergency Declaration Blanket Waivers for Health Care Providers (Mar. 28, 2020, most recent update, May 24, 2021), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/covid-19-emergency-declaration-waivers.pdf. The waivers for skilled nursing and nursing facilities are currently on pages 16-21.
[2] 42 U.S.C. §§1395i -3(b)(5), 1396r(b)(5), Medicare and Medicaid, respectively; 42 C.F.R. §§483.35(d)(1)(i), (ii),
483.35(c).
[3] 42 C.F.R. §483.35(c), Proficiency of nurse aides, was not waived. That section states, in full, “The facility must ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents’ needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care.”
[4] AHCA, Temporary Nurse Aide Training & Competency Checklist, https://educate.ahcancal.org/products/temporary-nurse-aide
[5] “Who’s Providing Care for Nursing Home Residents? Nurse Aide Training Requirements during the Coronavirus Pandemic” (CMA Alert, Jul. 23, 2020), https://medicareadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Report-Nurse-Aide-Training.pdf
[6] The full report is available at https://medicareadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/SNF-TNA-Report-09-2021.pdf
[7] CMS, “Updates to Long-Term Care (LTC) Emergency Regulatory Waivers issued in response to COVID-19,” QSO-21-17-NH (Apr. 8, 2021), https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-21-17-nh.pdf
[8] Danielle Levitan, “Temporary Nurse Aide Training a Huge Boon During Pandemic,” Provider (Feb. 10, 2021), https://www.providermagazine.com/Topics/Guest-Columns/Pages/2021/Temporary-Nurse-Aide-Training-a-Huge-Boon-During-Pandemic.aspx
[9] Maggie Flynn, “Lawmakers, Providers Call for Temporary Nurse Aide Extension – as ProMedica Tries to Fill 1,500 Jobs in One State Alone,” Skilled Nursing News (Apr. 15, 2021), https://skillednursingnews.com/2021/04/lawmakers-providers-call-for-temporary-nurse-aide-extension-as-promedica-tries-to-fill-1500-jobs-in-one-state-alone/
[10] Kimberly Marselas, “Even with PHE extension, providers worry about early demise of nurse aide waiver,” McKnight’s Long-Term Care News (Jul. 21, 2021), https://www.mcknights.com/news/even-with-phe-extension-providers-worry-about-early-demise-of-nurse-aide-waiver/
[11] Kimberly Bonvissuto, “Law creates permanent pathway to employment for temporary nurse aides,” McKnight’s Senior Living (Dec. 1, 2020), https://www.mcknightsseniorliving.com/home/news/law-creates-permanent-pathway-to-employment-for-temporary-nurse-aides/ (describing TNAs in nursing homes and assisted living facilities)
[12] Clark Kauffman, “State waives training requirements for nursing home staff,” Iowa Capital Dispatch (Sep. 1, 2021), https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2021/09/01/state-waives-training-requirements-for-nursing-home-staff/
[13] “Rep. Bollin spearheads plan to help frontline workers advance their careers” (News Release, Jun. 24, 2021), https://gophouse.org/posts/rep-bollin-spearheads-plan-to-help-frontline-workers-advance-their-careers
[14] 42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3(f)(2)(A)(i)-(iv), 1396r(f)(2)(A)(i)-(iv), Medicare and Medicaid, respectively. These detailed requirements address the number of training hours, qualifications of instructors, and subject areas for training. The federal regulations prohibit an aide from having any contact with a resident until the aide has completed at least 16 hours of training in five specified areas: “communication and interpersonal skills; infection control; safety/emergency procedures, including the Heimlich maneuver; promoting residents’ independence; and respecting residents’ rights.”
[15] 42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3(f)(2)(B)(iii)(I)(a)-(c), 1396r(f)(2)(B)(iii)(I)(a)-(c)
[16] 42 U.S.C. §§1395i-3€(a), 1396r(e)(1), Medicare and Medicaid, respectively
[17] AnnMarie Lee Walton and Bonnie Rogers, “Workplace Hazards Faced by Nursing Assistants in the United States: A Focused Literature Review,” Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May; 14(5): 544, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451994/; Stephen Campbell, “Workplace Injuries and the Direct Care Workforce” (PHI Issue Brief, Apr. 2018), http://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Workplace-Injuries-and-DCW-PHI-2018.pdf
[18] Id., citing U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities. 2018. Occupational Injuries and Illnesses and Fatal Injuries Profiles, https://www. bls.gov/iif/; analysis by PHI (Jul. 23, 2019)
[19] Galinka Khatutsky, Joshua M. Wiener, Wayne L. Anderson, and Frank W. Porell, “Work-Related Injuries Among Certified Nursing Assistants Working in US Nursing Homes,” RTI Press, p. 4 (Apr. 2012), https://www.rti.org/rti-press-publication/work-related-injuries-CNAs/fulltext.pdf
Private Equity Companies Continue Buying Nursing Facilities
Skilled Nursing News reports that the average price per nursing home bed increased nearly 22% in the first quarter of 2021 over 2020 prices.[1] Vikas Gupta, senior vice president of acquisitions and development at Omega Healthcare Investors, described the market for nursing homes,
“We’ve got headlines about nursing homes being the worst thing in the world, and we’re seeing the per bed price the highest they’ve ever been. So it’s a beyond-weird world.”[2]
Who’s paying these high prices? The answer, often, is private equity (PE) firms. Nursing facility purchases by PE firms reflect what appears to be an accelerating consolidation of ownership in the nursing home industry. Of great concern is that PE-owned and operated facilities often have poor records of care, shifting money from nursing staff and resident care to profits.[3]
Most recently, DAC Acquisition LLC acquired Diversicare, a company with 61 nursing centers with 7,250 beds (among its 397 licensed facilities), agreed to pay $10.10 per share in cash,[4] when the stock was selling for $2.84 per share.[5] DAC Acquisition is a privately held company whose manager, Ephram Lahasky, “has significant affiliations with in excess of 100 owned and/or leased skilled nursing and similar centers in over 20 states.” Laca Wong-Hammond, managing director and head of Mergers and Acquisitions at Lument, described DAC’s acquisition of Diversicare as
“one of many aggressive take-downs by PE because of plentiful equity capital that’s been raised chasing a dearth of deals, historic low cost of debt coupled with high available leverage, attractive yields offered by senior care assets, and the tailwind of demographic drivers. Whether distressed or core opportunities, the oversupply of capital makes this a seller’s market – we’re experiencing this firsthand with the strongest M&A pipeline in recent memory.”[6]
Lahasky, President and CEO of MED Healthcare Partners, “is identified as a stakeholder, partner, or company affiliate of at least 69 long-term care facilities in Pennsylvania.”[7] Lahasky told Bucks County Courier Times in 2020 that he began purchasing nursing facilities about eight years earlier and that he has “between 10 and 12 different sets of business partners.”[8] MED Healthcare Partners operates more than 80 facilities in 16 states, with more than 8,000 certified beds.[9]
Another private equity firm, Portopiccolo, expanded from one nursing home in 2016 to approximately 100 facilities in 2020, operating under a variety of names such as Accordius, Pelican Health, and Orchid Cove.[10] Barron’s reported that 43% of the 75 facilities listing Portopiccolo’s CEO as an owner received one-star (the lowest rating) in the federal government’s five-star quality rating system, compared to 17% of facilities receiving that rating nationwide. The Washington Post similarly reported that Portopiccolo bought nursing facilities during the pandemic, with “scant scrutiny from regulators despite poor safety records at dozens of the company’s other nursing homes, including hefty fines for infection-control lapses and shortages of staff.”[11]
To address these troubling ownership and management issues, the Center for Medicare Advocacy and colleagues have called for better state oversight of nursing home ownership and management and for the adoption of federal regulations governing which providers are eligible for Medicare and Medicaid certification and reimbursement. In addition, we call for rules directing how providers actually spend public reimbursement that is intended for care and limiting the amount that can be spent on overhead and profit.[12]
___________________
[1] Alex Zorn, “Some REITs Worry Where Hot SNF Market Will Lead,” Skilled Nursing News (Sep. 8, 2021), https://skillednursingnews.com/2021/09/some-reits-worry-where-hot-snf-market-will-lead/?itm_source=parsely-api
[2] Id.
[3] Atul Gupta, Sabrina T. Howell, Constantine Yannelis, and Abhinav Gupta, “Does Private Equity Investment in Healthcare Benefit Patients? Evidence from Nursing Homes?” (Feb. 2020) full report available through https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3537612; Eleanor Laise, “Private-equity takeover of nursing homes has reduced quality of care at critical moment, research suggests; for-profit ownership and private-equity backing of nursing homes, academic studies show, may weaken facilities’ staffing levels and compliance with federal standards,” MarketWatch (Mar. 14, 2020), https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coronavirus-pandemic-puts-private-equity-ownership-of-nursing-homes-under-microscope-2020-03-14?adobe_mc=MCMID%3D27544074148082056223030259368856516599%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1596726240; Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund, “The Deadly Combination of Private Equity and Nursing Homes During a Pandemic; New Jersey Case Study of Coronavirus at Private Equity Nursing Homes” (Aug. 2020), https://ourfinancialsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AFREF-NJ-Private-Equity-Nursing-Homes-Covid.pdf); Laura Alexander and Richard Scheffler, Soaring Private Equity Investment in the Healthcare Sector: Consolidation Accelerated, Competition Undermined, and Patients at Risk, (May 18, 2021), https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Private-Equity-I-Healthcare-Report-FINAL-1.pdf; Eileen O’Grady (Private Equity Stakeholder Project), Pulling Back the Veil on Today’s Private Equity Ownership of Nursing Homes (Jul. 21, 2021), https://pestakeholder.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PESP_Report_NursingHomes_July2021.pdf
[4] Diversicare, “Diversicare to be Acquired by DAC Acquisition LLC for $10.10 Per Share in Cash; Delivers Significant Cash Premium of Approximately 256% to Diversicare Shareholders” (Aug. 27, 2021), https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210827005039/en/Diversicare-to-be-Acquired-by-DAC-Acquisition-LLC-for-10.10-Per-Share-in-Cash
[5] “Diversicare to be Acquired by DAC Acquisition LLC for $10.10 Per Share in Cash” (Press Release, Aug. 27, 2021), https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2021-08-27/diversicare-to-be-acquired-by-dac-acquisition-llc-for-10-10-per-share-in-cash
[6] Danielle Brown, “Diversicare acquisition could be an example of what’s to come,” McKnight’s Long-Term Care News (Aug. 30, 2021), https://www.mcknights.com/news/diversicare-acquisition-could-be-an-example-of-whats-to-come/
[7] Jo Ciavaglia, “New owners of Twining Village have ties to state’s worst COVID-19 nursing home outbreak,” Bucks County Courier Times (Aug. 20, 2020), https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/news/2020/08/21/twining-village-owners-nursing-homes-covid-19/5617974002/
[8] Id.
[9] Id.
[10] Eleanor Laise, “As the Pandemic Struck, a Private-Equity Firm Went on a Nursing-Home Buying Spree,” Barron’s (Aug. 6, 2020), https://www.barrons.com/articles/as-the-pandemic-struck-a-private-equity-firm-went-on-a-nursing-home-buying-spree-51596723053 (subscription needed)
[11] Rebecca Tan and Rachel Chason, “An investment firm snapped up nursing homes during the pandemic. Employees say care suffered,” The Washington Post (Dec. 21, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/portopiccolo-nursing-homes-maryland/2020/12/21/a1ffb2a6-292b-11eb-9b14-ad872157ebc9_story.html
[12] See Center statement submitted to the National Academy of Sciences (Jan. 13, 2021), https://medicareadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/nursing-homes-NAS-nursing-home-committee-CMA-comments-01.13.2021.pdf
Free Webinar, October 20 (2-3 pm) | Medicare Enrollment Issues for 2022
This webinar will discuss the 2022 Annual Coordinated Election Period (ACEP), including outreach and education materials issued by the Medicare program, Medicare Plan Finder updates, common enrollment pitfalls, options when you miss your Initial Enrollment Period, and other considerations for Medicare beneficiaries and those who assist them. Policy changes, potential helpful legislation, and other updates for 2022 will also be discussed, including Medicare Advantage network adequacy and other changes made by final regulations.
- Register now at https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5896392103778054926