June 12, 2008

THE BATTLE TO IMPROVE MEDICARE – ROUND TWO

The House of Representatives passed legislation in 2007 that would have reduced overpayments to Medicare Advantage plans and would have made significant improvements for beneficiaries.[1]  Similar efforts by the Senate, however, were unsuccessful, mostly for political reasons. The debate began again with the introduction by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, of S. 3101, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act.  The bill, which is co-sponsored by Senators Snowe (R-ME), Rockefeller (D-WV), and Smith (R-OR), is on a fast track.  Congressional action on a Medicare bill is needed by the end of June to address a reduction in Medicare payments to physicians that will otherwise go into effect on July 1, 2008.

 

Whether legislation to fix doctor payments (referred to as the "doctor fix") will pass through Congress and survive a presidential veto – and, significantly, whether such legislation will contain the beneficiary improvements contained in S.3101- remains unclear.  A vote is scheduled for 3 p.m. today, June 12, to invoke cloture on the bill, that is, to allow it to proceed without filibuster.

 

This Alert summarizes some of the beneficiary improvement provisions contained in S. 3101,[2]  and also discusses some of the provisions of S. 3118, the legislative alternative introduced by Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee.

 

SUMMARY OF S. 3101

 

Provisions Affecting Individuals with Low Incomes

Provisions Affecting Medicare Parts A and B

Provisions Affecting Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage)

Provisions Affecting Medicare Part D

Provisions Affecting Marketing of Medicare Part C And Part D Plans

Other Medicare Improvements

THE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH – S. 3118

 

Senator Grassley introduced an alternative legislative approach, S. 3118, the Preserving Access to Medicare Act of 2008, on June 11, 2008.  While the Grassley bill addresses the problem of the reduction in payment to physicians, it provides virtually no assistance to beneficiaries, other than extension of the exception for therapy caps and provisions concerning marketing of Part C and Part D plans.  Of most concern to beneficiary advocates:

CONCLUSION

 

Once again protections for Medicare beneficiaries will be at the center of the debate on the action Congress should take in legislation that retracts the pending cuts to Medicare physician payments.  Senate Bill 3101, in addition to addressing the doctor payment problem, includes important beneficiary improvements and takes steps to reign in overpayments to Medicare Advantage plans. The Grassley alternative ignores the needs of beneficiaries, including individuals with limited incomes, and ignores the problems created by PFFS and MA plans.

 

If Senate Bill 3101 can survive the politics surrounding any legislation that makes changes to Medicare Advantage plans, and the politics surrounding legislation that includes low-income beneficiary protections, Medicare beneficiaries will gain some real improvements in their access to care.

 

Check your news sources to learn the outcome of today's important vote.

 


[1] See, Center for Medicare Advocacy, Weekly Alerts, August 9, 16, 23, 2007.
[2] Additional highlights about the S. 3101 are available at http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/baucus.htm.

Copyright © 2010 Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.