|
www.MedicareWorks.org
Support Real Reform Now
ALJ/MAC Decision Database |
 |
|
THE CENTER FOR MEDICARE ADVOCACY IN THE NEWS,
2008
|
December 2008
- Click here
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/ to read “Center For Medicare
Advocacy Issues New Recommendations For Real Reforms To Help
Medicare Beneficiaries And Taxpayers” from Medical News Today on
December 23. According to the piece, the Center for Medicare
Advocacy released a report detailing specific methods for keeping
Medicare a vital, efficient and cost effective public program. The
Center's report, Options for Real Medicare Reform, offers specific
suggestions for improving the program and can be found at
http://www.medicareadvocacy.org/Reform_08_12.18.OptionsforRealReform.pdf.
- Click here
http://www.elderlawanswers.com/ to read “Five-Star Rating System
for Nursing Homes Arrives, for Better or for Worse” a December 20
article from Elder Law Answers. According to the article, when the
rating system was announced earlier this year, Toby Edelman, senior
policy attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said that two
of three criteria CMS uses for the ratings -- staffing data and
quality measures -- are "self-reported by nursing facilities and are
inaccurate." Edelman said, "Relying on nursing homes to describe
accurately how well they are doing . . . just doesn't make sense."
- Click here
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ to read “Iowa Veterans Home
given poor marks” a December 18 article from the Des Moines
Register. According to the article, the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services just launched a new system of Web-based nursing
home rankings. The methodology behind those rankings is being
questioned by both the nursing home industry and advocates for the
elderly. Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney at the Center for
Medicare Advocacy, said the manner in which staffing levels are
calculated can produce misleading scores. "I think a lot of
facilities are going to have five stars for staffing that absolutely
don't deserve them," she said. "I'm glad they're trying to give out
more information, but I don't know that taking information that is
not that good, and assigning it stars, is going to make it more
useful - and it could be misleading people."
- Click here
http://thehill.com/ to read “Advocates hope Obama shifts from
private Medicare plans” a December 5 article from The Hill.
According to the article, advocates for the elderly are expecting
the incoming Obama administration to be more favorable to the
traditional Medicare program, and to move away from the private
insurers embraced by the current administration. “They’ve been
running Medicare as a program for insurance companies,” said Vicki
Gottlich, a senior policy attorney at the Center for Medicare
Advocacy.
-
Click
here
to read "For Your Benefit: Picking the
wrong Medicare drug option can be costly"
a December 2 Wall Street Journal article that provides
tips for choosing a part D plan. Medicare beneficiaries should
look at factors in addition to premiums, such as deductibles,
co-payments, and which drugs are covered. They
"have to be very wise shoppers. Don't
assume a drug will be covered this year,"
says Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare
Advocacy. The article also advises Medicare beneficiaries to
enroll in a plan as soon as they are eligible, determine the
best type of coverage, navigate the coverage gap, and get help
from advocates, family, and friends.
November 2008
- Click
here
to read "consumers Face Confusion When Picking Health Plans", a
November 25 article in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
According to the piece, Medicare enrollment periods are
confusing, and consumers need to be careful.
Judith Stein, executive director
of the Center
for Medicare Advocacy, said
"People need to make a choice
every year because the plan they're on
this year may well not be best for next
year," Stein said. Moreover, different
plans can cover different treatments and
drugs, and need to be examined before
they are picked. "You cannot just choose
on the basis of premium," she said.
- Click here to read
"Medicare Rx
Increases; Sorting Out Part D" a
November 21 article from The Ledger. According to the
piece, Medicare enrollees should be particularly careful this
year when choosing a Part D plan. "We're
seeing massive changes this year,"
said Vicki Gottlich, a senior policy attorney for the Center for
Medicare Advocacy, to the Orlando Sentinel. "Not
only are premiums going up substantially, but we're seeing huge
increases in cost sharing and new ways in which drug plans are
going to hit people with costs. People really need to be
careful."
- Click here to read
"Now's the time to
sign up for Medicare Part D" a
November 20 San Antonio Express News article. The article
describes the current enrollment period for Medicare Part D and
some of the changes that plans will undergo in 2009.
Judith Stein of the Center for
Medicare Advocacy says that the premium on most plans is going
up and that Medicare beneficiaries are likely to note that
different drugs are covered. The article offers resources for
Medicare recipients who need assistance with finding the plan
that best meets their needs.
-
Click
here
to read "Medicare Part D Enrollment questions and answers" a
November 14 Chicago Tribune
article (it also appeared in the
Orlando Sentinel). The article answers
questions about Medicare Part D including eligibility and
coverage requirements, and advice for comparing different drug
plans. The Center for Medicare Advocacy's Vicki Gottlich says,
"We're seeing massive changes this year -- not only are premiums
going up substantially, but we're seeing huge increases in
cost-sharing and new ways in which drug plans are going to hit
people with costs. People really need to be careful."
-
Click
here
to read "The Breakdown: It's time to get started in choosing a
Medicare plan" a November 14 Sun-Sentinel article. The
article includes a few quick tips for Medicare recipients in
South Florida who are going to enroll or change their Medicare
Part D coverage. The Center for Medicare Advocacy is included as
a resource for general help and advice on Medicare Part D.
-
Click
here to read
"Medicare Moves" a November 14 Wall Street Journal
article. The article describes various types of Medicare
coverage and explains that Medicare Part D has a wide array of
plans to choose from, making it difficult to navigate. "It's
like comparing apples to oranges to kiwis," says Judith Stein,
executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
- Click here to read
"Health plan options can be confusing" a
November 12 Associated Press article. According to the piece,
millions of people are receiving letters in the mail notifying
them of the open enrollment period for their health-care plans,
but the letter may not be easy to understand since health
information is often presented in an unclear way, leaving
consumers confused. Judith Stein, executive director of the
nonprofit Center for Medicare Advocacy, said seniors using the
government program need to make sure they understand their
choices, especially for Medicare's Part D prescription drug
program and for Medicare Advantage plans, which are run by
private insurance companies as part of Medicare. "People need
to make a choice every year because the plan they're on this
year may well not be best for next year," Stein said. Moreover,
different plans can cover different treatments and drugs, and
need to be examined before they are picked. "You cannot just
choose on the basis of premium," she said.
- Click
here
to read "Medicare enrollment set to start" a November 11 Ironton Tribune article. The article says,
"According to the
Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Web site, people on the Part
D plan, which is through private insurance and not Medicaid
itself, will see a $20 increase in their deductible in 2009,
with the plan going from $275 to $295. Then Medicare pays 75
percent of the next $2,405 worth of drugs. After that comes the
"donut hole" — the threshold when the senior has to pay for 100
percent of the next $3,453.75 out of their own pockets."
- Click here to read
"Your guide to Medicare; enrollment in health,
prescription drug plans runs from November 15 to December 31" a
November 9 Sun-Sentinel article. The article describes
the importance of choosing an affordable plan and includes an
extensive guide of prescription drug and health plans available
to Medicare recipients in South Florida. According to the
article, some plans are changing formularies - lists of drugs
they cover. "Seniors who don't check may choose a plan that, on
Jan. 1, no longer covers a drug they take," said Center for
Medicare Advocacy attorney Vicki Gottlich.
- Click
here
to read "Tips for choosing a plan" a November 9 article from
the South Florida Sun Sentinel. The piece advises people
choosing a Medicare plan to study whether prescription drug
coverage works for them. For advice on choosing a plan,
seniors and disabled people can contact the Center for
Medicare Advocacy.
- Click here
to read "Time to Review Seniors' Drug Options" a November 9
Wall Street Journal article focused on the Medicare
enrollment period. According to the article, Medicare
beneficiaries may be better off shopping around this year
for prescription-drug plans. Seniors who are considering
Medicare's private health plans should know that the
traditional Medicare program offers access to most doctors
and hospitals. In addition, according to the Center for
Medicare Advocacy's executive director Judith Stein, "The
widest choice is in the Medicare program. When people
travel and become ill, they are often taken aback by the
limitations" with so-called Medicare Advantage plans.
October 2008
- Click
here
to read "Wasteful Subsidies"
a letter to the editor published in the October 27 Hartford
Courant. Medicare subsidies to private plans are wasted
funds, according to Matthew Shepard, the Center for Medicare
Advocacy's communications
coordinator. He argues that traditional Medicare operates
for less than Medicare private plans, and even if subsidies
let private plans offer "added" benefits, many of these are
designed to attract younger, healthier beneficiaries. When
they leave traditional Medicare, it skews the actuarial
pool, leaving the poorest and sickest beneficiaries in
traditional Medicare. The result: The traditional program
will be overloaded with the costliest beneficiaries. When
this happens, costs for Medicare go up and cries for cuts
increase. These wasteful subsidies are one more attempt to
dismantle a program that has been a success for more than 40
years.
- Click here
to read "Health Matters: Navigating a Path Around Medicare's
'Doughnut Hole'" from the October 18 Wall Street Journal.
The article describes Medicare Part D's doughnut hole or
coverage gap. The prescription plan covers medication costs
up to a total of $2,510, after which a beneficiary is
expected to cover the next $3,216 in costs before the plan
once again covers most of the beneficiary's expenditures. As
a result, some beneficiaries with chronic illnesses who
cannot afford to pay full retail price for their medications
stop taking them when they reach the doughnut hole.
According to the article, with Medicare's open-enrollment
period starting Nov. 15, it's time for people on Medicare to
examine their options and ways to sidestep the doughnut
hole. "You need to do the math," says Center for Medicare
Advocacy attorney Vicki Gottlich. That includes estimating
your drug expenses for next year, understanding how the
doughnut hole works, and identifying ways to minimize
out-of-pocket expenses.
- Click
here to read "No more free lunches from Medicare
marketers" from the October 12 Syracuse Post-Standard.
According to the article, the government has imposed new
marketing restrictions on private health plans in response
to widespread complaints about their deceptive and
aggressive sales tactics. The new rules prohibit
telemarketing and other unsolicited sales contacts, and they
ban some financial incentives. Center for Medicare Advocacy
attorney Vicki Gottlich doubts the new rules will make much
difference because some of the new provisions are stricter
versions of rules that were already in place but often
ignored by health plans, and health plans are already trying
to figure out how to get around the new rules.
- Click
here to read Saul Friedman's October 11 Gray Matters
column in Newsday "Elders'
self-interest is to vote for Obama." Friedman says it
is in everyone's self-interest to protect Medicare and
Social Security. He believes that Barack Obama would support
both programs as president, while John McCain would not.
He cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy as saying,
"Medicare has kept millions of older people out of poverty,
relieved children from worrying about paying for the care of
their elders and helped increase life expectancy of people
at age 65."
- Click
here to read "Medicare Won't
Pay for Hospital-Care Blunders,"
an October 7th Bloomberg.com article. The piece focuses on a
new Medicare policy which will cut payments to hospitals for
medical mistakes in the hopes of improving quality of care.
However, some patient advocates think denying payments may
hurt patients and lead to billing disputes between them,
hospitals and Medicare. According to Alfred Chiplin,
a senior attorney for the Center for Medicare Advocacy,
"Beneficiaries who fit certain
illness profiles will not get services."
August 2008
-
Click
here to
read "Watchdog group says Medicare overpaying nursing homes by
$1.5 billion", an August 30 article form the Naples
Daily News. The article describes planned overpayments
to nursing homes in 2009, and quotes Center attorney Toby
Edelman, who says "The windfall to skilled nursing facilities
comes with no strings attached and there is no reason to believe
this windfall will help improve the quality of care or quality
of life for nursing home residents."
-
Click
here to read "Nursing Home Industry To Receive $1.5 Billion
Overpayment In 2009" by Center attorney Toby Edelman.
The August 29 piece appearing from Medical News today outlines
overpayments that the Medicare agency will knowingly pay skilled
nursing facilities in 2009.
-
Click
here to
read "Nursing Homes to Get Sprinklers `Years' Late" an
August 26 article from Bloomberg News. The article quotes
Center attorney Toby Edelman on the need to continue use of
other devices even after sprinklers are finally installed in
facilities, years later than they should have been. "Smoke
alarms and sprinklers serve different purposes,'' said Ms.
Edelman, "You want redundant protections.''
-
Click
here
to read a copy of "Many Struggling With Health Plans"
an August 24 letter to the editor of the Hartford Courant
by Center Communications Coordinator Matthew Shepard. The
letter is in response to a piece by a beneficiary who was
trapped in her private Medicare plan, and offers solutions to
her problem.
-
Click
here
to read "New Rules Regarding final Days" a McClatchey Newspapers
article by Mark Agee that appeared in the Hartford Courant
on August 18, as well as in other papers (See August 1 Fort
Worth Star Telegram as "Hospice patients have more
control of their treatment under new regulations).
Center attorney Terry Berthelot is quoted on the improvements
for hospice patients made by the first updates to the hospice
regulations in 25 years, saying "These are simple changes
that will make a big difference to patients at the end of their
lives... Historically, doctors have
been encouraged to back away from patients when they enter
hospice, but this keeps familiar
people involved," she said. "Plus, it's nice to have someone
there who is not
concerned with the hospice's bottom
line."
-
Click
here
to read "Conn. Relying on Nursing Home Chains", an Associated
Press article that appeared in the Hartford Courant and
other papers on August 17. Center attorney Toby Edelman is
quoted on the effect that chains have on quality of care, saying
"Ownership is certainly a factor in
quality of
care...
They send a lot of money to their corporate offices...
There can be a lot
of
distance between the owners and the facilities themselves.
They're not on the ground."
-
Click
here
to read "Medicare premiums to rise for drug
plans", a South Florida Sun-Sentinel
article by Bob LaMendola from August 15. In the article,
Center attorney Vicki Gottlich discusses the rise in Part D
premiums and other costs that don't get as much attention,
saying "We
still don't know how much more people are going to pay for their
drugs... Even if the premium in the
plan isn't going up and people are happy with
everything, they should look at all the plans and see
which one is best for them."
July 2008
- Click
here to read "Serious violations at homes spike" and "Fines
sometimes go unpaid by nursing home" articles from the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (from July 26 and 27,
respectively). One article focuses on violations in nursing
homes that result in injuries and risks to seniors across
Wisconsin. Toby Edelman comments on fines for nursing homes
with violations, saying, "The fines are so trivial now in amount
compared to the harm that has been done to the resident. It is
just the cost of doing business for the industry." The other
article focuses on how these fines often go unpaid. Edelman says
that even when fines are levied, collection systems don't seem
to work. "The fines get proposed and reduced and then they don't
get paid and go uncollected." The July
26 article also appeared on
RedOrbit.com.
- Click
here
to read "Thousands Lose Coverage When
Program Dropped" a Mobile Register
article from July 9th. The piece summarizes the local effects
of Congress' neglect to re-authorize the "Qualifying
Individual Program" due to a tight
Medicaid budget. Almost 16,000 Alabamians are being dropped from
the program and will now have to pay their own premiums. The
article quotes Center for Medicare Advocacy senior policy
attorney, Patricia Nemore, who said Congress has always
reauthorized the program in the past. "It's
obviously popular. Nobody wants to be the one who cuts this
program out."
- Click
here
to read "Nursing homes will now be rated," from the July 8
Pottstown Mercury. The article focuses on the new rating
system for nursing homes put forth by the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services that will allow potential residents and
their families to comparison shop for the best home. The article
cites a senior staff attorney at the
Center for Medicare Advocacy who "warns consumers that this
rating system is likely to be flawed if CMS relies on
inspections and quality measures reported by the nursing homes
themselves as complete data."
- Click
here
to read "Medicare Mess"
from the July 4 Virginian-Pilot. The article highlights
the resistance many Medicare beneficiaries experience when
trying to report billing mistakes. Often interpreted as
reluctance on Medicare's part, it can be difficult to navigate
through the network of Medicare representatives one can reach
through 1-800-MEDICARE. The article quotes Judith Stein who says
that this experience is "classic"
and that she hears "all the time from
people who have called the 1-800-MEDICARE number and are quite
unsatisfied with the results."
- Click
here to read "Retire Smart" a Columbus Dispatch
article from July 1 which lists health insurance possibilities
for individuals in early retirement, including the continued
coverage guaranteed by COBRA, individual policies, Medicaid, and
Veterans Affairs. The article says that Medicare -- a proven,
efficient way to deliver health-care services -- may be
expanding its eligibility standards, which might help ease the
program's solvency issues. Furthermore, Vicki Gottlich says, "It
would take care of a large number of uninsured people."
June 2008
-
Click here
to access "Settlement to Ease Drug Costs for Some on
Medicare" by Robert Pear. This New
York Times article from June 19 discusses the recent
settlement filing in the Center for Medicare Advocacy's
Situ
v. Leavitt lawsuit regarding dual eligibles' treatment
under Medicare Part D. the article quotes Center attorney
Gill Deford, who says the settlement will "help hundreds
of thousands of people a year get
their prescription drugs more quickly, at nominal cost."
The settlement filing was also reported by
United Press International,
the Hill,
Medical News today,
Long term Living Magazine,
the Wichita Eagle,
MedGuru (india),
RedOrbit News,
the Naples News,
the Post Chronicle,
lawyers and
Settlements, Health News,
Amed
News
and others.
-
Click
here to read "U.S.
Preps Nursing-Home Rating System", a June 19
article from the Wall Street Journal. The
article details the new 5-star rating system for skilled nursing
facilities that the Bush administration has proposed to improve
the quality of care in those facilities. The article
quotes Center attorney Toby Edelman, who expresses doubts about
the system, saying several criteria "are
self-reported by nursing facilities and are inaccurate." "Too
often, nursing facilities report that residents are doing much
better than they really are and that they have more staff than
they really have," [s]he said.
"Relying on nursing homes to describe accurately how well they
are doing -- and reporting that information as fact -- just
doesn't make sense."
Ms. Edelman was also quoted on this issue in the
Springfield News-Leader,
,
the
Kaiser
Daily Health Policy Report,
Medical News today,
and Elder Law
Answers.
-
Click
here to read "Seniors, be wary of fraud",
a June 23 article form the Greenwich Post. The article
discusses a Center client who was the target of Medicare Part D
phone scam and urges caution for seniors.
-
Click
here to read "Seniors be wary of fraud" a June 19
Greenwich Post article that reminds seniors to be on the
lookout for identity theft. The piece describes a fraudulent
call in which a client of the Center for Medicare Advocacy was
told that all Medicare beneficiaries were required by law to
make a one-time $374 payment in order to have prescription drug
coverage.
-
Click here to
read "Washington state gives inspectors
more tools, including power to halt
nursing home's admissions to get
problems fixed" a June 7 article from
the Press Enterprise detailing Washington state's more stringent
inspection system. Center attorney Toby Edelman is quoted
as saying "Most states defend the worst of the worst of
their nursing homes," said Toby
Edelman, senior policy lawyer at Washington, D.C.'s Center for
Medicare Advocacy
Inc., a consumer organization. "Washington has tough
regulations and isn't afraid to use
them."
- Click
here to read "Medicare premiums for drugs up 16%" an article
from the June 7 Florida Times-Union. The piece describes
new data showing that most seniors in Medicare's prescription
program are paying considerably higher monthly premiums for
coverage this year. The article cites the Center for Medicare
Advocacy as a resource for Medicare beneficiaries, saying,
"Compare options: The Center for Medicare Advocacy states that
all plans have different costs and benefits from year to year,
so it is wise for consumers to compare options."
-
Click here to
read "Casualties of Care" a June 7 article from the Press
Enterprise explaining that many nursing home patients and
family members say their complaints about caregivers are dismissed with little explanation or result
in minimal punishment.
The article cites Center attorney Toby Edelman, who
thinks that some
inspectors are poorly trained and won't substantiate an offense unless they witness it.
-
Click here
to read "Nursing home operators lose 93% of appeals:
report", an article regarding the Center for
Medicare Advocacy's recently released review of nursing
home decisions made in 2007 by the Department of Health and
Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board (DAB).
Center attorney Toby Edelman is quoted as saying "The
study shows not only that problems in care are serious and that
penalties are modest, but also that facilities choose to appeal
these enforcement actions throughout he administrative appeals
process. Almost always the facilities lose their cases."
-
Click
here to read
"Center for Medicare Advocacy Report Says HHS Weak on
Enforcing Nursing Home Errors", another take
on the Center's report, which focuses on the mild penalties and
the need for beneficiary awareness. Ms. Edelman is
quoted as saying "Despite the serious deficiencies
reflected by these cases, the federal enforcement response is
usually modest, at best ... The
federal government imposes only minor fines for these
deficiencies."
The Center's report is also cited in
Nursing Homes Long term Care Management.
May 2008
- Click
here to read "Medicare
supplier changes might confuse seniors" a May
23 article from the South Florida Sun Sentinel. According
to the article, A Medicare plan to slash about 30 percent
off the price of home medical goods — including oxygen, diabetes
supplies and walkers — also may baffle some seniors and
temporarily disrupt their care. Center
for Medicare Advocacy attorney Alfred Chiplin is quoted as
saying "There will be some chaos initially...The
people who use these items are often in crisis. They don't need
chaos." He goes on to say that
the new system can work — if managed well.
"This is Medicare," he said, "people need to watch it
carefully."
- Click
here to
read "Health Premiums Rising For Seniors With Genworth Policies"
a May 14 article from the Hartford Courant. According to the
article, some Medicare beneficiaries with Genworth policies will
see their premiums rise by 30%. Judith Stein is quoted as saying
that Genworth's repeated increases "will price many older and
disabled people out of the Medigap market and into private
Medicare Advantage plans without them necessarily knowing
whether those plans will meet their needs."
- Click
here to read "Oregon docs shun
Medicare patients" a May 4 article
from the Sunday Oregonian. According to the article, federal
regulations base Medicare reimbursement on historical costs.
Because Oregon has kept its health care costs relatively low,
Medicare provides less money, and fewer Oregon physicians are
accepting Medicare. The problem could be compounded in July,
when a nationwide cut in Medicare funding is scheduled to kick
in. "If the payment reduction goes through, that will be a huge
problem nationally," said Judith Stein, executive director of
the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
- Click here to read
"States Look to Rein In Private
Medicare Plans" a May 5 article from
the New York Times. According to the article, state officials
will soon ask Congress for more power to regulate the marketing
of private Medicare insurance plans to older Americans because
they are still receiving complaints of high-pressure sales
tactics that have led some beneficiaries to sign up for
unsuitable policies. Consumer groups support the request.
"It's a good
idea," said Vicki Gottlich, a lawyer
at the Center for Medicare Advocacy. The
piece was picked up by other outlets, as well.
April 2008
-
Click
here
to read "Seniors Legal Line"
a column from the April 24 Pine Journal (a weekly
Minnesota-based newspaper). The piece focuses on the fact
that Medicare does not pay for long-term care in a nursing
home. Typically, Medicare only pays for a short period of
time, after which the nursing home resident pays or is
eligible for Medical Assistance. The piece cites the Center
for Medicare Advocacy to explain skilled nursing and skilled
rehabilitation services.
-
Click
here
to read "Sharing the Medicare Burden"
a letter to the editor that appeared in the Washington Times on
April 28. The letter, by Michael Rubin of the Center for
Medicare Advocacy, says that only by investing in each other can
we become a society that protects and cares for those who have
come before us. He says that Medicare beneficiaries have always
shared part of the financial burden for health care, as required
by the law, contrary to some misconceptions -- including those
of the HHS Secretary's son.
-
Click
here to read
"Gray
Matters: President
George W. Bush Wants to
Cut Medicare", an
article by Saul Friedman that appeared in Newsday on April 26.
The piece describes the insidiousness of the Medicare act of
2003, and how administration officials used it to try to
dismantle the traditional Medicare program. The Center for
Medicare Advocacy's executive director, Judith Stein, is quoted
throughout, defending traditional Medicare and explaining the
damage recent legislation has done.
-
Click
here to read
"Medicare Patients Cut Back on Prescriptions" a WebMD article.
The article says a new study shows that Medicare beneficiaries
skip their medications to save money, despite being covered by
the program's Part D prescription drug plan. Researchers blame
Part D's benefit structure, which requires patients to share
some of the cost of their drugs with the government. Judith
Stein says organizations like the Center for Medicare Advocacy,
that are trying to educate seniors on Part D are stymied by the
plan's complexity. "Really using and understanding Part D is
beyond the resources of the few organizations that exist to
teach and the tens of millions of beneficiaries who use it,"
Stein says.
-
Click
here to
read "Medicare Bill A Boost For All" a letter to
the editor from Judith Stein, executive director of the Center
for Medicare Advocacy, that appeared in the Hartford
Courant on April 4. Stein states that Rep.
Linda Schofield's bill to increase Medicare Savings Program
eligibility is good for people and the state's finances.
According to Stein, the bill would allow more low-income people
to get help paying for their medications and for Medicare
premiums and co-insurance, while also obtaining federal funds to
help Connecticut meet these needs.
March 2008
-
Click
here to
read "Nursing Homes Changes Sought: Democrats Propose
Millions to Fund New Staffing Rules" an article that
appeared in The Hartford Courant on March 27. In the piece,
Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney at the Center for
Medicare Advocacy, said setting staff-to-resident ratios is
the best route to ensuring adequate care. Pouring more money
into nursing homes without setting ratios doesn't work to
increase staffing levels, she said.
-
Click
here
to read "Legislators want to add $9.5M for nursing home
staff" an article that appeared in The New Haven Register on
March 27. The piece cites Toby Edelman who said higher
staffing levels at nursing homes translates to better care.
"Facilities with higher levels of staffing have fewer
injuries, have less turnover of employees," Edelman said.
-
Click
here to read "Dems hope to secure better nursing homes"
an article that appeared in the Meriden Record-Journal on March 26.
According to the article, a proposed plan from Democrats in
Connecticut would provide $9.5 million in fiscal year
2008-09 to raise the minimum staff-to-resident ratio in
nursing homes. The article cites Toby Edelman, a senior
policy attorney for Center for Medicare Advocacy, saying
that adequate nursing staff is critical to providing good
care. "We need more staffing in nursing homes, and we
believe this legislation is the best way to get there,"
Edelman said.
-
Click
here to read "Democrats say their budget spends less
than Rell's plan" an article that appeared in the Boston
Globe on March 25. According to the piece, Senator Max
Baucus said that he wants to cut subsidies that are now
going to private insurance companies that sell private
Medicare plans. Judy Stein said she welcomed Baucus's
comments, adding such over-payments threaten the future of
Medicare itself.
-
Click
here
to read "Baucus tackles cuts in subsidies for Medicare
Advantage" an article that appeared in the Helena
Independent Record on March 23. According to the piece,
Senator Max Baucus said that he wants to cut subsidies that
are now going to private insurance companies that sell
private Medicare plans. Judy Stein said she welcomed
Baucus' comments, adding such over-payments threaten the
future of Medicare itself.
-
Click
here
to read "Understanding Medicare options" an article that
appeared in The Forest Blade on March 19. The piece explains
Medicare's many choices and plans for readers in East
Georgia, and cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy as a
resource for readers navigating the Medicare maze.
-
Click
here
to read "Gray Matters: Patients
restrained, greed isn't" an
article that appeared in Newsday on March 15. According to
the piece, "Although much of the money paid to nursing homes
comes from Medicaid and Medicare, the government often has
no idea where and to whom these proceeds go." Friedman
cites Toby Edelman of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, who
points out that nursing homes owned by Manor Care Inc., the
nation's largest nursing homes chain, were among the
facilities recently cited as deficient by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services. In December, Manor Care was
acquired by the Carlyle Group for $6.3 billion. Manor Care's
former chief executive got as much as $186 million when his
company was sold. According to Edelman, "Manor Care's 278
nursing homes could hire an additional 5,346 certified nurse
aides or an additional 2,198 registered nurses [with that
money]. Like all nursing home chains, most of Manor Care's
revenues come from Medicare and Medicaid. How should our
public dollars be spent? On one man's windfall, or certified
nursing assistants and registered nurses in nursing homes?"
-
Click
here
to read "Extension Medicare
program educates seniors" an
article that appeared in the North Platte Telegraph on March
10. The piece focuses on a local program to help seniors
understand the various options under Medicare Part D. It
cites the Center for Medicare Advocacy Web site as a source
for information about the 2003 Medicare Reform Act. The
article says the Act restructured the Medicare program and
provided Medicare beneficiaries with some limited assistance
paying for prescription drugs.
-
Click
here
to read "For Medicare,
'modernization' means 'destruction'"
a commentary by Judith Stein that appeared on Neiman
Watchdog on March 10. According to Stein, a critical
question that reporters must consider is, "Will we keep
giving away public money to private industry rather than
toward necessary health care for older and disabled
people?" Stein says that little has been written in the
mainstream media about the Administration's persistent,
remarkably successful effort to privatize Medicare. She says
this story should be reported because traditional Medicare
is almost universally cherished by Americans of all ages, on
a level with Social Security. In addition, the 2003
Medicare "Modernization" law was a major step toward the
destruction of traditional Medicare; the 2003 law created an
exclusively private prescription drug program, dramatically
expanded the role of private Medicare plans, and authorized
hundreds of billions of dollars to implement this move
toward privatizing Medicare.
-
Click
here to
read "Low Risk, Heavy Drugs; State's Nursing Homes Might be
Overusing Antipsychotics" an article that appeared in the
Hartford Courant on March 2. The piece describes how
Connecticut's nursing homes dole out antipsychotic drugs to
residents who do not have psychotic disorders at one of the
highest rates in the country. Toby Edelman of the Center
for Medicare Advocacy is cited in the article, saying that
in the 20 years since the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987
(which mandates that residents be free from "chemical
restraints" imposed for the purposes of discipline or
convenience) was passed, the industry has focused more on
reducing the prevalence of physical restraints than on
limiting chemical restraints. A high prevalence of
antipsychotic use in a nursing home can be an indicator of
inadequate staffing.
-
Click
here
to read "Gray Matters: Federal health programs for the
poorest elderly" an article that appeared in Newsday on
March 1. The piece says that millions of older Americans are
truly and desperately poor. Many need extra help because of
the higher costs for Medicare, and this column explores some
special programs for the lowest-income beneficiaries.
Friedman lists the programs and their eligibility levels,
citing the Center for Medicare Advocacy as the source for
his information.
February 2008
-
Click
here to
read "Gray Matters: Federal health programs for the
poorest elderly" by Saul Friedman, from
Newsday on February 29. The article describes
the impoverished conditions that afflict many of our
nation's elders, and details programs that can help with
health care costs, using information supplied by the Center
for Medicare Advocacy.
-
Click
here
to read "Clauses in nursing home agreements may violate the
law" an article that appeared in the Kansas City Star on
February 2. The piece describes a new study which raised
questions about how some nursing homes operate. The article
says elderly consumers and their families in Missouri should
be wary when signing long and often complex nursing home
agreements. Toby Edelman of the Center for Medicare
Advocacy is cited in the article, saying similar studies in
other states also show "ongoing concerns" with nursing home
agreements.
-
Click
here
to read "Old story: Hoping to age in place" an article that
appeared in the Chicago Sun Times on February 1. The piece
focuses on the dilemma of the "Sandwich Generation:" adult
children struggling to maintain their own homes and lives
while helping their parents live out their lives at home,
rather than in managed care. The article says that for
people searching for how best to approach helping their
parents age well, or for those approaching their senior
years and wanting to plan, Judith Stein of the Center for
Medicare Advocacy, suggests seeking assistance from a
qualified elder law attorney. She says, "The National
Academy of Elder Law Attorneys is a good source." Elder care
attorneys are familiar with Medicare and Medicaid rules and
can guide caregivers through other financial options such as
long-term care insurance and reverse mortgages.
January 2008
-
Click
here
to read "Mayo in Rochester unlikely to limit
Medicare patients" an article that appeared in the Post
Bulletin (of Rochester, Minnesota) on January 25. According to
the article, the Mayo Clinic in Arizona has
moved to limit care for Medicare patients, leading to worries
that other major health providers could follow suit. Mayo in
Arizona also stopped taking new Medicare Advantage Plan patients
January 1, although it will continue seeing established MAP
patients. The article cites Vicki Gottlich of the Center
for Medicare Advocacy saying that many major medical systems,
including Johns Hopkins and Sloan Kettering either limit
patients in Medicare Advantage plans or do not
accept them at all.
-
Click
here to read
"Medicare: Understand your options" an article that appeared in
the Mobile Register on January 7. The piece describes how
Medicare beneficiaries should learn as much as possible about
the different plan options before making a commitment. The piece
says that according to the Center for Medicare Advocacy, those
enrolled in private fee-for-service
plans have sometimes faced difficulties in finding doctors who
would treat them.
|
|
|
|