ATTENTION ALL MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES:
READ YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY 1099 FORMS!
Medicare beneficiaries with Social Security income have been receiving their 1099 forms. The 1099 forms report income received in 2006 and deductions taken from that income, including Medicare premiums.
In 2006, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) had difficulties in accurately withholding Part D premiums from beneficiaries’ Social Security checks. We advise beneficiaries to scrutinize their SSA 1099 forms to be sure that both income and deductions reported are consistent with their own records.
The following cases have been brought to our attention that might reflect widespread problems:
In early 2006, a beneficiary requested that her Part D premium be
withheld. She then left the plan for which the premium was being
withheld and requested that the withholding cease. Despite the
request, withholding continued and she had premiums deducted for the
entire year. As she tried to work matters out, SSA informed her that
their records did not show any deductions. The SSA 1099 she
received, however, reported deductions for the whole year. She
checked with her bank to verify the amount of her Social Security
benefit that had been direct deposited and was able to verify that
the premiums had, in fact, been withheld throughout the entire
year. SSA, however, avers that the 1099 they have for her shows no
deductions. This mystery is, as yet, unresolved.
A second case relates to the incorrect Part D premium refunds that
SSA sent to approximately 230,000 beneficiaries last summer. A
beneficiary and her spouse received the refunds – each received a
different amount although their premiums were identical. They did
not, however, receive the letter from CMS telling them how to return
the refunded amount. Without directions about how to return the
refund, they did not return the money. Their premiums had been
correctly deducted from their checks throughout the year.
When they received their 1099s for 2006, the amount shown for their Part D payments for 2006, presumably reported on the 1099 for the benefit of those who itemize deductions of medical expenses on their income taxes, was $200 less than the actual amount of premiums paid. After considerable sleuthing they determined that (1) the reduction was equal to the amount of the incorrect premium refund that they had not returned, but (2) because they have taxes withheld from their Social Security payments, the incorrect refund amount they received was actually lower than the amount that was allotted to them. While it appears that this explanation is correct, it was not easily discernable from the 1099 and was extremely confusing. The couple is also understandably concerned about potential further complications if CMS takes additional steps, in 2007, to recover the incorrect premium refund (which, at this time, appears unlikely).
Copyright © Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.