|
For other information, follow one of the links below or scroll down the page.
A Quick Screen To Aid In Identifying
Coverable Cases
Medicare claims for inpatient hospital care are suitable for
Medicare coverage, and appeal if they have been denied, if they meet the
following test:
The patient's condition must have been such that the care he
required could only have been provided in a hospital, or he required a skilled
nursing facility (SNF) level of care, and no SNF bed was actually available.
(Note: A SNF level of care means that the patient required skilled services -
from a physical therapist or a registered nurse, for example - on a daily
basis.)
Additional Advocacy Tips:
-
The opinion of the patient's attending
physician is the most important element in your case. If the
physician believes that it was medically necessary for the
patient to receive care in the hospital, or that he needed at
least a skilled nursing facility level of care but no skilled
nursing facility bed was actually available, you probably have a
winning case.
-
Ask the attending physician to put his or her
favorable opinion in writing, explaining with as much detail as
possible why the coverage standard described above is met in the
patient's case.
-
Usually a Medicare denial means not that the
patient must leave the hospital, but that any further stay will
be at his own expense. Remember, however, that the patient
cannot be required to pay unless he has been given a written
notice of denial of coverage, and once a written denial is
delivered he cannot be charged until the third day following the
notice. Example: denial notice delivered on Monday, the patient
can be charged for his stay beginning Thursday.
-
Appeal as quickly as possible. In some cases
the patient is entitled to "expedited" review, which may include
additional time in the hospital before charges accrue, if you
request a review immediately. The Medicare denial notice given
by the hospital will tell you how to immediately appeal by
calling the Connecticut Peer Review Organization.
Determinations & Appeals
The following is a detailed description of the Medicare
hospital benefit, including the role of peer review organizations and hospitals
in making coverage decisions, and the patient’s right to review. Medicare
coverage for services received in acute care hospitals is probably the most
important component of the Medicare program. 95% of all Medicare Part A coverage
goes for hospital care. Nevertheless, recent developments in the hospital area,
particularly the imposition of the prospective payment system, have caused
serious problems for beneficiaries. More than ever, it is vital that
beneficiaries understand how to protect their right to a fair degree of Medicare
hospital coverage.
After the payment of a
deductible amount ($992 in 2007),
a beneficiary is entitled to Medicare coverage for 90 days of hospital care
during each "spell of illness." A spell of illness begins when a beneficiary
enters the hospital, and does not end until the beneficiary has been out of the
hospital, or the nursing home, for 60 consecutive days (or remains in the
institution but does not receive Medicare-covered care for 60 consecutive days).
In addition, the beneficiary is entitled to 60 days of hospital care as a
"lifetime reserve." Once exhausted, lifetime reserve days may not be
replenished. Days 61 through 90 also require the payment of a coinsurance of $248
per day during the year 2007. The coinsurance for
lifetime reserve days is $496 per day for 2007.
In 1983 Congress established a prospective payment system
(PPS) for Medicare reimbursement of inpatient acute care hospital services.
Under PPS, Medicare payment is made at a predetermined, specific rate for each
discharge. All discharges are classified according to a list of
diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). The list contains approximately 500 specific
DRGs. Each DRG is assigned a dollar amount based on the average cost of caring
for patients with similar diagnoses in the past. The reimbursement for
appendicitis, for example, might be set at $2000. For every patient treated in
the hospital for appendicitis the hospital would receive $2000 in Medicare
reimbursement regardless of whether the patient’s care actually cost the
hospital less, or more, to deliver. This means that the hospital can make a
profit by discharging a patient as early as possible. On the other hand, the
hospital will suffer a financial loss if the patient remains in the hospital too
long. In essence the hospital has a financial incentive to give less care.
The rules of Medicare hospital coverage are administered by
Peer Review Organizations (PROs). PROs are composed primarily of physicians
designated by and contracting with the secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services to review the provision of health care services and items for
which Medicare may be paid for purposes of determining whether those services
were reasonable and medically necessary, whether the quality of such services
meets professionally recognized standards of health care, and, in the case of
hospital services, whether they could have been effectively provided more
economically on an outpatient basis or in an inpatient health care facility of a
different type.
Although QIOs oversee in a general way the granting and
denial of Medicare hospital coverage, hospitals themselves are given the job of
determining the availability of Medicare coverage in
most cases. Often the QIO will review the appropriateness of
a given admission on a retroactive basis. In fact the patient may have left the
hospital before the QIO informs the hospital that the admission was not
medically necessary. Sometimes the hospital is denied payment. This means that
the hospital is very concerned to admit only those patients for whom the QIO
will approve coverage. Significantly, patients who are unable to gain admission
to the hospital are usually denied all access to QIO review. Unless the patient
takes affirmative steps to request QIO review of an admission denial, the QIO
will never learn that the patient has been denied. Thus the hospital has a
financial incentive to deny admission in certain cases, and that denial decision
is usually not subject to review. Many observers feel this situation has led to
a significant loss in access to hospital care, particularly for very elderly
patients beset by "chronic" conditions.
At the time of admission to the hospital, the hospital must
provide every individual who is entitled to Medicare with a written statement
which explains the individual’s rights to benefits for inpatient hospital
services and post-hospital services under Medicare, the circumstances under
which the individual will or will not be liable for charges for remaining in the
hospital, the individual’s right to appeal denials of benefits for continued
in-hospital services including the practical steps to initiate such appeal, and
the individual’s liability for payment for services if such denial of benefits
is upheld on appeal.
A hospital may not charge a beneficiary for any service for
which payment is made by Medicare even if the hospital’s cost of furnishing
services to that beneficiary is greater than the amount the hospital is paid.
The hospital may charge the patient only for the applicable deductible and
co-insurance amounts, or for services which are not covered by Medicare because,
for example, the care is custodial (non-skilled), is not medically necessary, or
could be effectively delivered more economically on an out-patient basis or in
an in-patient facility of a different type.
COVERAGE
CRITERIA
The hospital may charge a beneficiary for services received
in the hospital only if all of the following conditions have been met:
-
The hospital must determine that the patient
no longer requires in-patient hospital care (the phrase
"in-patient hospital care" includes cases where a beneficiary
needs skilled nursing facility care, but a skilled nursing
facility bed is not available.)
-
The attending physician agrees with the
hospital determination in writing, or, if the hospital is unable
to obtain an agreement from the physician, the QIO concurs in
the hospital’s determination.
-
The hospital must notify the beneficiary in
writing that the beneficiary no longer requires in-patient
hospital care; that customary charges will be made for continued
hospital care beyond the second day following the date of the
notice; that the QIO will make a formal determination on the
validity of the hospital’s finding if the beneficiary remains in
the hospital after he or she is liable for charges; that the
hospital’s denial decision is appealable, and that any charges
for continued care will be refunded if a finding is made on
appeal that the patient did require continued in-patient
hospital care.
-
On July 2, 2007, per
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) a
final rule became effective which governs notification to
Medicare beneficiaries of their hospital and critical access
hospital discharge appeal rights. As an aide to
beneficiaries and their advocates, we have provided several
key documents related to this rule:
MEDICARE APPEALS
PROCESS
A beneficiary’s right to appeal a denial of Medicare hospital
coverage varies upon whether the attending physician has agreed that in-patient
hospital care is no longer necessary. If the attending physician has not agreed,
the hospital must obtain the approval of the QIO before it may issue a denial
notice to the beneficiary and begin to charge for services rendered. A
determination by a QIO that in-patient hospital services are no longer necessary
is an Initial Denial Determination subject to appeal. In such cases the
beneficiary may immediately request a Reconsideration of the denial by the QIO.
The Reconsideration Request must be filed within 60 days after receipt of the
Notice of Denial.
Normally reconsideration determinations are issued by the QIO
within 30 days after the receipt of the reconsideration. However, in situations
where the QIO has denied admission based on pre-admission review, or where the
beneficiary is still an in-patient, reconsideration may be sought and determined
on an expedited basis. The beneficiary must submit a Request for Reconsideration
within 3 days of receipt of the denial notice. The QIO must then issue its
reconsideration determination within three working days after receiving the
request if the beneficiary is still awaiting hospital admission, or is currently
a hospital in-patient for the stay in question.
In cases where the attending physician agrees that the
hospital discharge is appropriate, however, the hospital will not normally
obtain QIO agreement before issuing a denial notice to the patient and assessing
charges for services rendered. In such cases the beneficiary has the right to
request an expedited review by the QIO. The following apply if the beneficiary
requests QIO review before noon of the first working day after a written denial
notice is properly delivered:
-
The hospital must provide written records to
the QIO by the close of that first working day and;
-
The QIO must issue a review decision within
one full working day after the date the QIO received the Review
Request and records.
If the patient requests a speedy QIO review as described
above, the hospital may not charge the patient for any charges incurred before
noon of the day following the day on which the QIO review determination is
received by the patient. If the patient is dissatisfied with the result of the
QIO review, he or she may still request a reconsideration of that decision. The
rules pertaining to reconsideration described above would pertain.
If the patient is dissatisfied with the result of the QIO
reconsideration, and the amount in controversy is at least $120,
he or she may obtain a hearing by an administrative law judge of the Social
Security Office of Hearings and Appeals. This administrative hearing must be
requested within 60 days after receipt of the reconsideration decision.
Acute Hospital Articles
And Updates
|